Search results

Yes, but as Obama so often repeats, he's only been in the office for 1 year while "the previous administration" had 8. And as the dems so often repeat, "Give him more time", I'm sure the gaffes will equate.

If you haven't seen it yet, here you go: http://www.navytimes.com/news/2009/11/UPnavy_seals_charged_112409w/

There was a decent discussion of "global warming", "climate change" or whatever the new euphemism is, back in July: http://www.airwarriors.com/forum/showthread.php?t=149643&highlight=climate

Maybe he felt he was entitled to instant street cred with that statement.

I didn't state it was based on what he thinks. I stated he announced there would be no COLA and the reason why. I'm neither regurgitating Limbaugh nor O'Reilly, but your hissy is duly noted.

After ending the fiscal year with a record $1.4 trillion federal deficit and wanting to spend $1 trillion more on healthcare reform, now Obama wants to spend $13-$14 billion giving those on social security a $250 check, right after he announced they would get no COLA due to no inflation for 2009.

Did you actually read the proposed bill(s) and the CBO analysis and can emphatically state it will play out like you state it will? It looks like you have only referenced the White House talking papers on the subject. Do you think that is an objective source?

A wise man once said, "Teach a man to fish, then cut him off the tit"...or something like that.

Is all or part of this going to be fixed with Obama's version of socialized healthcare? Please reference for me the sections in the healthcare proposal that address these issues.

In other words, Obama wants to give 50 million more people healthcare benefits, while the supply of hospitals and doctors remains stagnant. So everybody gets healthcare but nobody can get in to see the doctor. And in the end we've paid $1 trillion, supposedly whittled down to $239 billion...

If that's your definition, then fair enough. From the CBO analysis: http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/104xx/doc10464/hr3200.pdf the cost of the bill would be just over $1 trillion, but partly offset by "spending changes" to whittle down to $239 billion. How do you suppose they would accomplish that?

He beat him, but is 53 to 46% of the popular vote considered "crushing"? Really? You'd vote to spend $1 trillion dollars to make "Hannity's head explode"? Wow.

I read that with skepticism as well and debated about whether to keep that part of the quote in there, but decided to keep at least the quote accurate.

Yet another AARGM update: http://atk.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=118&item=952 ATK summary: "The ATK missile designed to take-out enemy air defenses even if they shut-off their radar systems scored a picture-perfect direct hit in the final live fire test of the System Development and...

Just as an FYI, ATK has been developing an "Objective Individual Combat Weapon" that has some pretty interesting technology like air-burst capability. You can read about it here: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/m29-oicw.htm

F-10 is the export designation: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/j-10.htm

Here's what I use and like it: http://tinyurl.com/kr6l65 You can read the label from their website. It has everything you need, and then some.

Update: "Debris found in ocean not from missing Air France plane": http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jun/05/air-france-crash-debris-atlantic

http://tinyurl.com/mptfz7 (LA Times article) andhttp://tinyurl.com/mqnr8a (ATK article)

AARGM test update. Everything going very well so far: http://atk.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=118&item=921

On the Metric vs. Imperial conversion team. :icon_smil

I'll answer that one for you - it's affixed to the top of fuselage so it doesn't go anywhere. Typical entitlement generation victim mentality.:sleep_125

Great read Huggy! I'm one of your ex-datalink (MIST) guys: Osan '92-'93. While maintaining the datalink, I always enjoyed shooting the sh!t with the pilot during the mission. One of you was nice enough to give this E-4 at the time a ride in the chase car during a landing. I also remember being...

AARGM update:http://atk.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=118&item=884

The anger management chick in pic 1: :hot_anima

DNA links bones near plane crash to Fossett: http:/www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,446464,00.html

AARGM is cleared for low-rate initial production: http://atk.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=118&item=863

F-35A flight testing update: http://www.compositesworld.com/news/f-35a-to-begin-extended-flight-testing.aspx

Perhaps this question is more appropriate for the "Stupid Questions..." thread, but after searching, this thread was all I could find. Out of pure idle curiosity, I was wondering how a pilot who is wearing an oxygen mask clears his/her ears since, I'm assuming (hopefully correctly), the...

After this statement, "I suspect I am going to get very sick of heaing about her sick kid for the next 2 months, though, especially if it is brought up in terms of the abortion debate." I will consider your advice.

Removed.

Are you speaking geographically or electorally?

For those interested, the AARGM just had another successful flight test: http://atk.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=press_releases&item=839

Press release today concerning the AARGM: http://atk.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=press_releases&item=813

The company I work for, ATK, is developing an AARGM. Here's a little more info: http://www.atk.com/customer_solutions_missionsystems/cs_ms_w_sw_aargm.asp And here: http://atk.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=press_releases&item=515

Cougar "loses it" and turns in his wings.

Here's a link to the video that should get past the filters: http://video.knbc.com/player/?id=170479

Wrong :icon_hamm. The air force has been around since 1907, when it was called the Aeronautical Division, U.S. Signal Corps. They went through 5 other name changes until 1947, when they changed their name to U.S. Air Force.

"heyjoe" remembers. Look at his earlier post on this thread.

Since he's not good enough for "Meat", how about "Spam"?

Sharebuilder and T.Rowe I just starting using Sharebuilder this weekend for individual stocks. I've used T.Rowe Price for about 6 years now for my 401k mutual funds and am extremely happy with their performance.