Not much "battling of the branches" going on here. Let me try and get something started. I submit to you, that the Marine Corps, while most people aren't aware of its elite "air arm", puts its air assets to use in the most effective way. The Navy is close, but the Marine Corps leads the way as usual, not only on the ground first to fight, but also in the air. Marine aviators are in the fight, supporting the ground element closer than any other services air elements. It is no accident that Marine aviators are first trained in infantry skills and tactics. What other branch can boast that their aviators can quite easily assume the role of a ground commander? I can't fathom a Navy, Air Force, or Army pilot trying to relate to and lead a bunch of infantrymen hungry to get some in ground combat at close range with enemy forces. So in sum, Marine Corps aviation is leading from the front keeping with tradition since 1917; which by the way is a handful of decades before the Air Force was even a twinkle in anyone's eye. :icon_smil
I thought this was supposed to be a joke thread. In a way it is, FlyMike, oh master of unintentional irony.
I am a Marine, and an aviator, and I'll submit your premise is rubbish. The Marine Corps is good, probably the best, at what it does, but it is very specialized. Like you say, we, or rather
I and my fellow aviators and aircrew, do a great job of supporting ground forces. That's like comparing a decathelete against a sprinter. We can't even get more than a couple of aircraft to a fight without either Navy shipping support or USAF tanker support.
Both of those players have much broader responsibilities in their air components than our measly 6 functions of Marine aviation. We aren't doing strategic reconnaisance, strategic deterrence, or really anything above the operational level of war. This isn't a shortcoming of Marine air, just a statement of fact. There's a much bigger world out there than that provisional platoon commander business they dish out to you at TBS.
As far as this aviator leading troops business, before you criticize a Navy pilot for not leading grunt Marines, go drive a damn ship for awhile. He's in the fvcking Navy--why would you expect him to be prepared to lead ground troops? As far as the Army pilots, they generally live closer to the ground troops than our pilots do. And why should an Air Force pilot be prepared to lead troops as a ground commander at all--there are no line USAF ground troops (not counting IAs, specops, airmen shanghaied into convoy ops, etc.).
I know you're moto and all, but step back and look at the big purple team we have here. Those other branches are equally capable as the Marines at WHAT THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO DO. Bitching that they're not Marines is like bitching at Tiger Woods at the fact he can't block a linebacker.