Question: what is the grading criteria ... ???Punk said:Well, its unheard of for Kingsville boat scores. They must grade you guys like santas. :icon_tong
I.e., OK=4.0, (OK)= 3.0, etc., etc. ???
Question: what is the grading criteria ... ???Punk said:Well, its unheard of for Kingsville boat scores. They must grade you guys like santas. :icon_tong
A4sForever said:Question: what is the grading criteria ... ???
I.e., OK=4.0, (OK)= 3.0, etc., etc. ???
Well .... that's what I thought. Grading and all ... so how is it that a "2.9-2.98" is "Santa Claus" or "unheard of" ... ??? (reference the grading discussion in above posts)Punk said:yep, same as the fleet
Bolter = 2.5, - = 2.0, etc
FNAEB=Field Naval Aviation Evaluation Board (IE-You 'F'ed up and have to go to the principle's office)Recidivist said:Pardon my ignorance, but:
what is FNAEB and failure to make MC?
Are these guys being separated from the Navy altogether, and if so why?
A4sForever said:Well .... that's what I thought. Grading and all ... so how is it that a "2.9-2.98" is "Santa Claus" or "unheard of" ... ??? (reference the grading discussion in above posts)
Between a 2.75 and 3.0 used to be average, with both the T-2 and TA-4. Several guys in my class and the classes on either side of mine scored 3.0-3.5 or so. When I was waving STUDs in TW-3 ... the "good" guys got @ 3.3. Not "unheard of" at all ...
.... and lest you think otherwise --- Santa Claus don't live here.... I'm Buddhist.
(HCDAW) 3 wire should be an OK pass ... everything else being equal, as that is the purpose of the (little) comment. Minor (little) deviations about the glideslope. HCDAW would be a (OK), as you either got such a high start you couldn't really correct early in the pass or you are --- "lazy" --- and just accepted a HCDAW because ... well .... because you're lazy. A couple of those at the BOAT and no positive response to radio "counseling" or corrections and it's a trip to the beach to think about the error of your ways.brd2881 said:It seems to me that in Kingsville...no matter if you throw a (HCDAW) 3-wire pass that you will never get the OK.......... I think its the LSOs riggin' the grades to ensure the bets are won and their liquor cabinets are full of the finest!!![]()
Regardless, we all qualled and it was a blast.
RetreadRand said:that's untrue; retreads have the same reqs, same syllabus, same everything as everyone else...
I'll chime in to support brd2881 and Punk. I'm no salt, but in my year+ at K-ville, I've never heard of anyone with an average starting with a 3.A4sForever said:Several guys in my class and the classes on either side of mine scored 3.0-3.5 or so. When I was waving STUDs in TW-3 ... the "good" guys got @ 3.3. Not "unheard of" at all ...
The Stinkster said:I agree with almost all that you are saying on the basic flying skills, and NSS/skill set reflection stuff Squeeze. I understand the NSS system pretty well I think, so I know how all aspects play out. I will end my interest in this thread with only one final point of interest. In advanced props, we are the first line to train the E2/C2 pilots as well. It routinely happens that your E2/C2 intermediate student goes through here and is sent off to Kingsville with a sub-30 NSS, by score performing far below the average prop student, etc and having a score that if he were to wing here, probably would equate to an attrite. Is he a worse pilot than the prop studs? His primary NSS would suggest that he was a better pilot. Are his skill sets just not suited to multi eng/inst stuff, or is it the magic of the MPTS NSS. I think I could venture a guess, but it might be more fun to see where this goes! This has spun up so well already!
[continued slight course correction/threadjack]nittany03 said:......our LSOs basically told us there was probably no way we could get an OK pass due to our being so green that any such passes were likely more luck than skilled finessing of the ball. Taking that into consideration, the (OK) was about as good as we could get......