It depends on the IP and stud...words words words...
Sure it does. I'm not giving Tiger a hard time for his ability or judgement...
But generally speaking, checkrides are a poor time to "give it a try", especially as a Primary stud.

It depends on the IP and stud...words words words...
I flew the Tacan Y in the sim and in the plane, and then flew the Tacan A at Rockport on my I4390 not because they didn't like me but because I was given the option and decided to give it a shot. They're both interesting approaches and make for a good challenge. I don't think there are too many instructors that would force you into flying those approaches if you didn't want to. There are plenty of other ways to fail a student on a checkride without resorting to that.
Sure it does. I'm not giving Tiger a hard time for his ability or judgement...
But generally speaking, checkrides are a poor time to "give it a try", especially as a Primary stud.![]()
My instructor told me it was role reversal day. He was the stud, I was the IP. I had to teach him everything about instruments in order for him to pass his instrument check. I would have rather him step on my balls with golf shoes (not the new faggy soft spikes either) than do that one again...If only they knew what was coming for the REAL instrument check in Advanced (at least on the helo side).
Yeah, I'm with you and agree w/ your sentiment. But often times I see studs sweat the 4390 after doing fine on the last 4+ flights. Even the guys w/ prior time. I just tell them to relax, keep doing what they've been doing, and don't get all worked up. If only they knew what was coming for the REAL instrument check in Advanced (at least on the helo side).
As for my personal REAL instrument check, the one in the T-45 was definitely a lot easier than the instruments we flew in the T-44.
And to add to the IAP discussion, how does one pilot nav to a point defined merely by a localizer and DME? Whichever KNGP approach that has Ducky is like that.
The LOC 31 at CRP is the only approach I see with DUCKY as an IAF. It's defined off of the localizer/dme as well as the CRP Vortac.
Ahh... CRP, yes. It makes so much sense now. That would be quite a challenge for a student.
And to add to the IAP discussion, how does one pilot nav to a point defined merely by a localizer and DME? Whichever KNGP approach that has Ducky is like that.
Otherwise, assuming you are not NORDO, there is that magic word . . . UNABLE.If you are into torturing yourself or sans GPS or FMS, I thought there were always feeder fixes or cross radials that allow you to nav to loc/dme fixes, but I am usually wrong.
Prop VT inst-x is a joke compared to HT INST-X