If you read the article, he said that as a way of saying, "I've been so hard on China compared to my predecessors that they've changed their ways. Go me. Winning." In typical Trump fashion. But look at his actions toward China throughout his presidency. Do I need to find the dozens of articles talking about him calling in the Wuhan Flu, China virus, saying China should be punished for this, etc etc? After all the sanctions he put on China, the "trade war" many derided him for starting, do you really believe he and Xi are best pals?
I don't believe anything he saysYou are saying you don't believe Trump when he says that his intel indicates the Chinese lab leak is a real possibility but he can't discuss it, but you believe him when he says they love each other at a summit?
Or maybe he didn't have the intel and was just lying. I put my $$$ on him lying.There are plenty of reasons he wouldn't/shouldn't declassify intel, as I'm sure you know.
So the journalists couldn’t have just done their job to begin with?So give it (facts, not politician's unsupported opinions) to Fox News or the WSJ. I didn't see any of those in your pretty little collage.
"You might want to visit this website and read these documents and talk to this guy."
Why didn’t journalists from Fox News, the WSJ, the NY Post, or other organizations do it? Good question.So the journalists couldn’t have just done their job to begin with?
The idea has been here all along. Do you not remember journos getting deplatformed from social media for daring to say that the virus was man-made? Big Tech and Big Media suppressed any dissenting opinion from The Science (TM).Why didn’t journalists from Fox News, the WSJ, the NY Post, or other organizations do it? Good question.
Based on the article you linked to, it took hundreds to thousands of crowd-sourced man-hours to pull all of the puzzle pieces together. All of those pieces were in the open literature, by the way.
But if the intel community already knew where the pieces were via whatever means, it’d be easy to tell someone where to look.
If they knew.
If Trump wasn’t lying about having the evidence.
Report by a government national laboratory concluded that the hypothesis claiming the virus leaked from a Chinese lab deserves further investigation.www.wsj.com
“WASHINGTONA report on the origins of Covid-19 by a U.S. government national laboratory concluded that the hypothesis claiming the virus leaked from a Chinese lab in Wuhan is plausible and deserves further investigation, according to people familiar with the classified document.”
Back in May 2020
Actually, there should be a Venn diagram made of the following 3 things:Trump and Xi are good friends? Disingenuous effort to create a Fauci boogeyman? All political bullshit? Yeesh. You either aren't paying attention, or you're the one making disingenuous comments.
Trump sanctioned and came down harder on China way before 2020, then he called it the Chinese virus from the get go. He stopped US participation in the WHO because it's clear they were not taking the lab leak idea seriously.
Fauci has been called out in this post since it's inception, and rightfully so as he's flip flopped and not followed the science throughout this pandemic. This is all just icing on the cake.
Is it mere political bullshit that Chinese negligence might have led to this whole catastrophe? Or that American actors played a huge part in a disinformation campaign during an election, about something that should absolutely have not been made a political football?
Fixed it for you.Actually, there should be a Venn diagram made of the following 3 things:
1. People who hate everything Trump.
2. People who think that Fauci, and anyone else who has ever disagreed with Trump, is incapable of lying.
3. People who think nothing abnormal happened during the past election.
It would probably encompass half of the current democrat party, which is sad. Not saying that's you, but it probably applies to those that serially post on this thread.