I read your post.
What do you know about "hardcore combat"?
America is not Israel.
The point is it shows some rather extreme political correctness and denial to get upset that a study finds that infantry with female infantry soldiers doesn't move and shoot with the speed and accuracy of all-male infantry. The Israeli female infantry were created more for reasons of political correctness and feminists, not because it was determined to be a good idea by the Israelis. So my point was if you take a country with actual female infantry, even they recognize the limitations (BTW I am not against women in the combat arms, that is not my place, just pointing out the silliness of ignoring biological reality).
Also what makes America different from Israel in this sense? We had infantry fighting terrorists for more than a decade, so do the Israelis.
That tabloid article isn't really valid and wouldn't pass a high school new article research requirement . It's "reporting" from the Marine Corps Times at a time when old generals didn't want any change or progress made in their good ole boy gun club. News flash- these are the same retired generals who are against the USMC changing their structure to fit future needs, and are actively campaigning against it. But it confirms your bias. So there's that.
I think you probably a lot of time on news sites and then post your findings on internet forums for those people you read about in hopes of confirming your biases.
What's wrong with the article? The article is citing a study done by the Marine Corps. I did not say that the study was correct and that the Secretary of the Navy is wrong, I said that it isn't hard to believe the conclusion of the study. If they did a study finding that all male soccer teams run and kick with a lot more speed and power on average than soccer teams that are say 50% women, would you be shocked with the findings? The study wasn't claiming that all male infantry are smarter than ones with females.