exNavyOffRec
Well-Known Member
What are the odds RADM Green completes his tour, I would think the CNO is getting tired of seeing this in the news cycle.
-
Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?
Go here:
Edit Account Details and Profile
Stand by for high seas, heavy rolls in NSW and JAGC
- Thread starter nittany03
- Start date
ABMD
Bullets don't fly without Supply
Have them all sign a Page 13, now they can't say they didn't know.
Trigger warning:
FormerRecruitingGuru
Making Recruiting Great Again
Trigger warning:
Stopped reading when they mentioned “doo doo”
A worn-out phrase that makes it pathetically obvious that the person using it has no credibility. As if your using RedState as an article didn't make that blatant enough. What's next, the rebuttal from Occupy Democrats?
Worn out, but still clearly QUITE effective...A worn-out phrase that makes it pathetically obvious that the person using it has no credibility. As if your using RedState as an article didn't make that blatant enough. What's next, the rebuttal from Occupy Democrats?
To quote a worn-out phrase from a worn-out movie:
“He got you, didn’t he?”
“Yeah...he got me.”
Did you actually read the article? CDR Salamander took time from his busy cloud yelling schedule to share it. You’re probably more aligned than you'd think.
FormerRecruitingGuru
Making Recruiting Great Again
I don’t know much about IGs or the like, but I did enjoy his take about Article 88 and the fact that there’s (apparently) a bunch of commissioned officers running around openly talking smack about the CiC and how it’s sort of bad for business when that happens.
I would also put my money on SOC Gallagher’s lawyer; he’s been pretty successful for his client thus far.
But I’m sure you disagree with his (and my) analysis on that as well. ?
It doesn't matter what SecNav thinks when Trump is his boss.
What analysis? If NSW goes through their FNAEB equivalents process, seems like we (and POTUS) ought to respect that, absent any clear evidence of unfairness. The guy was convicted of a serious crime. If NWS decides that that crosses the threshold, so be it.
That’s fine. It is, however, POTUS’ prerogative to NOT respect that. Such as is happening in this case.
The Navy is pretty good at appearing to scapegoat people (see recent propublica article about CDR Benson), and I’m sure SOC Gallagher’s supporters (which include POTUS) feel like he is being subjected to excessive persecution. Perhaps, given such high-level attention on this issue, a better overall strategy for NSW would be to do some introspective thinking, and handle their business themselves so other people don’t feel the need to handle their business for them.