RedGriffin
New Member
Keep in mind that new 18X5s aren’t even eligible to mob or take ADSW orders until after 36 mo (or 48 mo).
I hadn't heard this before -- thought that once you completed your PQS you were mob eligible?
Keep in mind that new 18X5s aren’t even eligible to mob or take ADSW orders until after 36 mo (or 48 mo).
You are, but it’s taking a large percentage of officers 36+ months to qualify.I hadn't heard this before -- thought that once you completed your PQS you were mob eligible?
You are, but it’s taking a large percentage of officers 36+ months to qualify.
Sounds pretty self-righteous to me. You cannot fault anyone for availing themselves of approved processes and procedures. Some have the same feeling as you about the VTU.
I'll bite, for the sake of devil's advocate.Sounds pretty self-righteous to me. You cannot fault anyone for availing themselves of approved processes and procedures. Some have the same feeling as you about the VTU.
Yes, but FITREPs only matter as you get close to your O-4 first look, at around 9 years in (or if you even care about making LCDR at all). At 9 years (or even less), I am totally comfortable that there is some necessary gaming of the system, and holding cards close to one’s vest, in order to not get screwed over.how ridiculous our FITREP system is
Taking a rare DCO spot as a non prior, then quitting the Navy at your first opportunity, with no intention of staying past 3 years or mobilizing, just to be able to say “Navy veteran” on your upcoming business venture/ political run/ whatever their hidden motive is?
Yes, but FITREPs only matter as you get close to your O-4 first look, at around 9 years in (or if you even care about making LCDR at all). At 9 years (or even less),
Availing yourself of the system is neither cheating nor is it dishonest. If the Navy thought it to be a problem, they would change the system. It's like the PFA system. There is a "Satisfactory" for a reason and still results in a P on an officer FITREP. If the Navy wanted Officers to be rated based on their scores, they would make that change in the FITREP system. But, for now, either doing the bare minimum or maximum each result in a P. And, just because you score an Outstanding does not mean your CO is going to give you a 5 for military bearing, especially if he/she is/are managing their average.If you ain't cheating, you ain't trying.
Availing yourself of the system is neither cheating nor is it dishonest. If the Navy thought it to be a problem, they would change the system. It's like the PFA system. There is a "Satisfactory" for a reason and still results in a P on an officer FITREP. If the Navy wanted Officers to be rated based on their scores, they would make that change in the FITREP system. But, for now, either doing the bare minimum or maximum each result in a P. And, just because you score an Outstanding does not mean your CO is going to give you a 5 for military bearing, especially if he/she is/are managing their average.
You absolutely must have language like this in your FITREP if you are rated below CO's average or are not EP. You must kick and scream to ensure that any anomalous grading is explicitly detailed in your Block 41. Doing so allows the briefer to detail as such in the voting tank and leaves no questions.Is it an up check to the board if the CO writes in the narrative "scoring only reflects separation decision / managing my average?"