+1 for the new guy sticking up for himself. If you actually look at it, you wasted more of your time criticizing him, than saying "100" and being done with it, how many hours do NFO's end up with?
+1 for the new guy sticking up for himself. If you actually look at it, you wasted more of your time criticizing him, than saying "100" and being done with it, how many hours do NFO's end up with?
Can't tell you how many times that has occured to me; kind of blows your mind. All of the stupid stuff posted...P. S. The old guys on here could one day be your squadron commander. Keep that in mind.
I think Brett's so salty, he can leave a sour taste in the unaccusomted mouth. For all newcomer's, Brett's advice is best taken with a margarita to wash down the taste. We need guys like him on here, so PLEASE don't piss them off so bad they stop posting.
P. S. The old guys on here could one day be your squadron commander. Keep that in mind.
I'd say about zero, when you can fly an entire IFR flight, in ACTUAL and not cheating under some hood, and only see the ground on takeoff and landing, and possibly read a magazine enroute, then we'll talk.
not to be a smart@ss here, but isn't that exactly what a pilot who holds an IR rating should be able to do? I know that at least 50% of my civilian IR training was in actual (crappy Pac NW weather) so maybe my experience was different than others, but that seems like meat and potatoes stuff for a competent pilot to me.
Lazy8s said:I'm not being a dick, i guess there is some confusion on what this site is designed for. And your right, you've been there and i havent, thats why i am asking questions that you have probably heard a million times. I will try to think of some better ones in the future.
+1 for the new guy sticking up for himself. If you actually look at it, you wasted more of your time criticizing him, than saying "100" and being done with it, how many hours do NFO's end up with?