• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Energy Discussion

Randy Daytona said:
With the Sea Lion oil field advancing, combined with the weakness of the Royal Navy now, wonder if Argentina is going to take another look at The Falklands?

Click to expand...

The 'weakness' of the RN is far outweighed by the laughable state of the Argentinian armed forces. Plus, while smaller than it used to be I am not sure I would call a navy with F-35B-equipped carrier/s (they can only equip one at a time, but still...) and Tomahawk-armed subs 'weak'.
 
Flash said:
The 'weakness' of the RN is far outweighed by the laughable state of the Argentinian armed forces. Plus, while smaller than it used to be I am not sure I would call a navy with F-35B-equipped carrier/s (they can only equip one at a time, but still...) and Tomahawk-armed subs 'weak'.
Click to expand...
That brings up a good question: how capable are the Queen Elizabeth’s as it was implied earlier that without AEW, Growlers and AR, carriers were not effective. And considering the size difference between the QE’s (65,000 tons), America class ginormous LPH’s (40,000 tons) and Izumos (27,000 tons) are some useful without the aircraft that have to be catapulted?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top