COVID-19

[FrankTheTank]

I’m not sure as to the accuracy of this article but a very interesting read nonetheless.

https://beforeitsnews.com/health/20...violations-of-the-nuremberg-code-3039685.html

 

[taxi1]

Let’s see the list of 10,000 doctors.

That was literally the stupidest thing I’ve ever read.

 

[FrankTheTank]

Let’s see the list of 10,000 doctors.

That was literally the stupidest thing I’ve ever read.

Since you don’t agree with it then it‘s stupid! All this time I thought you were the scientist and teaching the future to be critical thinkers? What do you disagree with? What’s not factual?

 

[taxi1]

What’s not factual?

This is a “leaky” gene therapy that does not provide immunity to Covid and claims that they reduce the symptoms, but double-vaccinated are now 60% of patients who need ER or ICU with covid infections.

Pure bullshit

 

[Treetop Flyer]

I stopped reading pretty quick but pretty much every claim other than the point about pcr tests was bullshit.

I do find it interesting how fast we’ve switched from the virus’s lab origin being a fringe conspiracy theory. It’s almost like blaming China could have affected a political campaign.

 

[Tycho_Brohe]

Since you don’t agree with it then it‘s stupid! All this time I thought you were the scientist and teaching the future to be critical thinkers? What do you disagree with? What’s not factual?

Well, A: it doesn't cite any sources for its claims whatsoever (the source at the bottom is just a different article from which it was copy-pasted, an article which did the exact same thing with its own source, except the original source is a Swedish blog); and 2: its sole argument is that the vaccine is not effective at preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalizations, or deaths, or at reducing its symptoms, which is laughable (note that this article actually has a lot of citations backing its assertions).

Also he claims that Ivermectin, an anti-parasitic, is an effective alternative treatment, which is reminiscent of last year's claims that hydroxychloroquine prevents COVID. Maybe if your tapeworm has COVID, Ivermectin could help. The article just reeks of conspiracy theory clickbait, and the ads it hosts don't help dispel that:

 

[Python]

Pure bullshit

Agree 100%. Can’t believe this was actually put to print.

 

[FrankTheTank]

Ok how about the information in this link?

https://pilotmedical.info/

I was hoping I would get better feedback like Tycho gave with the his reply! I’m no Doctor, or Scientist or Virologist. I would prefer y’all tell me what‘s wrong with the information than just discounting it as bullshit.

 

[ABMD]

Well, A: it doesn't cite any sources for its claims whatsoever (the source at the bottom is just a different article from which it was copy-pasted, an article which did the exact same thing with its own source, except the original source is a Swedish blog); and 2: its sole argument is that the vaccine is not effective at preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalizations, or deaths, or at reducing its symptoms, which is laughable (note that this article actually has a lot of citations backing its assertions).

Also he claims that Ivermectin, an anti-parasitic, is an effective alternative treatment, which is reminiscent of last year's claims that hydroxychloroquine prevents COVID. Maybe if your tapeworm has COVID, Ivermectin could help. The article just reeks of conspiracy theory clickbait, and the ads it hosts don't help dispel that:

View attachment 30935

But I want a strong, healthy aura!!

 

[taxi1]

Ok how about the information in this link?

https://pilotmedical.info/

I was hoping I would get better feedback like Tycho gave with the his reply! I’m no Doctor, or Scientist or Virologist. I would prefer y’all tell me what‘s wrong with the information than just discounting it as bullshit.

That article you linked to the worst sort of thing I’ve ever read. Can you imagine keeping the fact that the mRNA actually doesn’t work at all a secret? Every single hospital in the USA would have to be in on the lie. All of them, in all states, in all towns. What are the odds.
Regarding your other link, just for example...

In fact, this type of vaccine has not even undergone animal trials of any sort.

That is a lie. The Pfizer and Moderna were tested in animals. Google it.

Also...

This is not a conventional vaccine!1 It is a messenger RNA technology that acts inside your body’s cells, modifying the way they behave.

Guess what, when you get a traditional attenuated virus vaccine, how do you think it works? They use an attenuated virus so it gets inside your cells and hijacks the cell to make what it wants. It modifies the way your cell behaves.

They have to use an attenuated virus to sneak in the code, rather than sticking it in directly.

They tailor the new virus so it makes your cell make the spike protein. Same as an mRNA vaccine, but the mRNA doesn’t use a full virus to do so.

Sounds safer to me frankly, not using a full virus that could go rogue and start making copies of itself, which is what viruses do in the wild.

 

[ABMD]

What are your thoughts about this whole "shedding" stuff making it's way around social media.

 

[Treetop Flyer]

What are your thoughts about this whole "shedding" stuff making it's way around social media.

As far as vaccinated people shedding actual virus? It’s bullshit.

 

[taxi1]

What are your thoughts about this whole "shedding" stuff making it's way around social media.

Some vaccines use an attenuated virus that gets in the body and actually replicates like a normal virus (tells your cells to make more of them) but half-assed so your body can train to it but not get you sick. You can shed that virus, possibly infecting others with it, like a normal infection.

The J&J doesn’t work that way. The attenuated virus doesn’t replicate, it just tells your cells to make a bunch of spike proteins. The mRNA isn’t even a virus to begin with.

 

[ABMD]

Some vaccines use an attenuated virus that gets in the body and actually replicates like a normal virus (tells your cells to make more of them) but half-assed so your body can train to it but not get you sick. You can shed that virus, possibly infecting others with it, like a normal infection.

The J&J doesn’t work that way. The attenuated virus doesn’t replicate, it just tells your cells to make a bunch of spike proteins. The mRNA isn’t even a virus to begin with.

Right, that's what I was tracking and explained those same facts, no live virus in the C19 vaccine so it can't "shed", but they said it's the Spike Proteins that are shedding. I call BS.

We've have friends who are big anti-vaxxers ask those that have been vaccinated not to come around for at least 2 weeks due to "shedding". I just shake my head.

 

[scoolbubba]

What are your thoughts about this whole "shedding" stuff making it's way around social media.

I love that I don't know what you're talking about. Social media is the real virus. Much happier without that bullshit in my life anymore.