That's why I asked the question, guys .... inquiring minds and all. I'm still not "sold" ... I read other stuff, too --- much of it critical. But I respect the perspective of knowledgeable people and especially .... (Phrog) .... operators. But the -46 ??? 1950's and early 1960's design (?) ... I'm quite sure the -22 would be "impressive" by comparison.
How about combat?? The crucible. That's where it counts ... Generals and Congressmen won't be flyin' it .... into a hot LZ.
Thanks 'Joe and 'Phrog --- seriously --- some people on this forum think if you ask a question or offer a different opinion --- you are "arguing". That's not the case, I assure you. Why am I even saying this .... ???
I appreciate your illumination.
How about combat?? The crucible. That's where it counts ... Generals and Congressmen won't be flyin' it .... into a hot LZ.
Thanks 'Joe and 'Phrog --- seriously --- some people on this forum think if you ask a question or offer a different opinion --- you are "arguing". That's not the case, I assure you. Why am I even saying this .... ???
I appreciate your illumination.
![17568fon.jpg](/community/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fotosearch.com%2Fcomp%2Fsby%2Fsby094%2F17568fon.jpg&hash=21939314a6e7e788add85d27622eb410)
![Wishes.jpg](/community/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wdwinfo.com%2Fwdwinfo%2Fguides%2Fmagickingdom%2Fphotos%2FWishes.jpg&hash=bec506086af34382b5951da7f8868dd3)
![bluff1.jpg](/community/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.skyrockers.org%2Fphotos%2Fpromo%2Fbluff1.jpg&hash=001694f65eb7e6cfc60b06f414197706)