• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Who are our phrog pilots out there?

Stearmann4

I'm here for the Jeeehawd!
None
Old 46D Crewchief 90-93. Now the black bus. Bigger doesn't always equate to better...if you were wondering.
 

Fly Navy

...Great Job!
pilot
Super Moderator
Contributor
WRT the linked page, lots of stuff fails OPEVAL and still makes it to the fleet. There is a lot more to it than simply saying, "Well, the spec says cruise at 275 kts, but we can only do 255, so we'll just sh!tcan the whole design and go back to the drawing board." I understand that this isn't the thrust of the thread, but people need to understand that there are competing interests involved in the equation, and sometimes getting a usable (albeit imperfect) product out to fleet end users is preferable to no product at all, or additional cost over-runs. Things can get fixed down the road as required. That's what AFCs and software upgrades are for. [/rant]

Brett

And that's the reality of practical engineering. You can pay an a$$ton of money to get a perfect product, which will be way behind timeline and probably obsolete by the time you get it.... or.... the realistic engineering solution is something that works, but might be flawed or imperfect. Guess which way they teach at engineering schools....
 

MasterBates

Well-Known Member
GMI teaches strive for #1, but realize when #2 will meet the need.

Writing realistic specs helps too. Marketing / Styling ALWAYS will promise/design stuff that cannot be delivered:

As fast as they want it

As cheap as they need it

That can be reasonably produced in time.
 

Fly Navy

...Great Job!
pilot
Super Moderator
Contributor
GMI teaches strive for #1, but realize when #2 will meet the need.

Writing realistic specs helps too. Marketing / Styling ALWAYS will promise/design stuff that cannot be delivered:

As fast as they want it

As cheap as they need it

That can be reasonably produced in time.

Yep, realistic engineering.

The common mantra at my school was "MIT will find the perfect solution, but it will take too long and cost too much. You'll be taught to find the solution that works."

Sometimes you need and want that perfect solution.... a lot of the times it's not practical.
 

Stubby

Ask the Chief
Thought you guys could appreciate this...

I got this photo in my e-mail not to long ago; I thought you all would be able to appreciate it...

If you don't think our military pilots earn their pay ... you need to take a look at this picture .. and then look again and realize what you're seeing ...

This photo was taken by a soldier in Afghanistan of a helo rescue mission. The pilot is a PA Guard guy who flies EMS choppers in civilian life. Now how many people on the planet you reckon could set the ass end of a chopper down on the roof top of a shack on a steep mountain cliff and hold it there while soldiers load wounded men in the rear??? If this does not impress you ... nothing ever will. Gives me the chills and a serious case of the vertigo ... I can't even imagine having the nerve ... much less the talent and ability ... God Bless our military!!!!!
 

Attachments

  • 46.JPG
    46.JPG
    53.4 KB · Views: 180

ChuckMK23

FERS and TSP contributor!
pilot
It's called a pinnacle landing and it's NOT the the most difficult thing to do - especially if you have a decent crewman giving you good voice commands on the position of the ass end of the aircraft. The Phrog and Chinook excel at this kind of thing and from a piloting perspective it's one of the features of the aircraft design that make this pretty routine.

It looks way more dramatic than it really is, trust me.
 

KnightNArmor

ASO
pilot
It may look more dramatic... but for someone like me who doesn't do them very often and is still learning the techniques... it's still a hair raising, stomach turning event.
 

phrogpilot73

Well-Known Member
It's called a pinnacle landing and it's NOT the the most difficult thing to do - especially if you have a decent crewman giving you good voice commands on the position of the ass end of the aircraft. The Phrog and Chinook excel at this kind of thing and from a piloting perspective it's one of the features of the aircraft design that make this pretty routine.

It looks way more dramatic than it really is, trust me.

I agree - not very difficult. Depending on how high the peak is, can be taxing hovering the nose that long... I got a bunch of flak from the guys in the battalion when they saw that picture, told me that I couldn't do that in a Phrog. Then I showed them a picture of me doing it in Albania on a huge cliff...

Oh, and in case you were curious, Phrog pilot that's trying to transition to the Coast Guard...
 

KnightNArmor

ASO
pilot
I know that we train for pinnacle landings... but how often do we actually do them... I'd love to hear some stories about those...
 

phrogpilot73

Well-Known Member
I know that we train for pinnacle landings... but how often do we actually do them... I'd love to hear some stories about those...
Do you mean in order to accomplish the mission? I used to do them every chance I got for a photo op, but have only done them a sum total of twice for mission accomplishment.

The first time was in Albania, the zone was just large enough to land a Phrog, but the winds did not support landing long axis. By landing short axis, there was very little room so we decided that doing a pinnacle would be the best idea. Did the pinnacle, grunts got off, and we flew back to the boat. No big deal.

The other time was in Yuma, again zone big enough for one Phrog. Again, winds only supported the short axis of the zone. This time the zone was outside our cross-slope limit (no, I didn't measure, but three attempts at the zone convinced me). So, I came into the little (and level) ridge that was just in front of the zone, did a Pinnacle and lowered the ramp. This time, the guys in back didn't think that we had landed and refused to get off. The crewchiefs had to "persuade them" that we were in fact on the ground.

I've attempted a couple in Yuma so as to not make the TACP team have to hump up the mountain, but it was a little too craggly up there... And the grunts say the assault support pilots don't love them...
 

phrogdriver

More humble than you would understand
pilot
Super Moderator
Buddy of mine did an extract in Afghanistan using a pinnacle landing. The peak I went to didn't even allow that--we had to use the hoist.
 

jtusega

New Member
Yo yo

New to the page, thought I'd post first here. I'm proud to be a Phrog driver, and am on my first combat tour here in the sandbox a short 2 1/2 months after finishing the FRS. Got the 'ole firehose treatment...

JT
 

ChuckMK23

FERS and TSP contributor!
pilot
So what works and what doesn't anymore on the Phrog?

So what still works with the mighty Phrog in the Sandbox? Where does your machine beat out the "me too" sky full of H-60's? How have the incremental improvements in the H-46E platform made for a more combat worthy ship?

  • GPS?
  • Electronic HSI?
  • COMM/NAV CDU
  • Lightweight Armor
  • Bull Frog Fuel stub-wings
  • Gold Stripe T-58-16 engine reliability upgrades
  • Dynamic component improvements
  • Simula aircrew seats (has this made it to the fleet?)

Would enjoy hearing some perspective from guys/gals flying the Phrog day in and day out.

Thanks!
 

phrogdriver

More humble than you would understand
pilot
Super Moderator
The CNCS (GPS, COMM) and Bullphrog mods have been around so long, no one here will probably know the difference.
 
Top