No, no and no. Read into the program and don't make any assumptions about it based on what the Army does. There will be no converting to CWO by URL officers.
-
Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?
Go here:
Edit Account Details and Profile
The Warrants have arrived
- Thread starter e6bflyer
- Start date
No, no and no. Read into the program and don't make any assumptions about it based on what the Army does. There will be no converting to CWO by URL officers.
This is stupid, misinformed and humorous all at the same time.
What is a NA? Naval Aviator? What exactly gives you the expertise to make such a comments like:
Am I correct to assume you are not an NA but a wannabe. Thus, WTF would you know what a true NA would rather serve in. The Navy is about sailing
In 14.5 years, I don't recall the last time I saw a sailboat........maybe the boat school has a few. I guess being I'm an actual NA, I've been flying, not sailing.........for the Navy.Again, advice or opinion given by a wannabe or Naval Aviator? If it's by a non-NA as you like to refer to, then this comment and all of yours in general are pretty much meaningless.
roba8vr
Hozer
Bunk22
Don't need to be a rocket scientist or NA/NFO to see what is instore for Naval Aviation and the Warrant Officer program. The test program will be a complete success. It will take approx 15-20 years before it will be fully implimented where 50% of the aviators both NA/NFO will be warrant. Just like the Army.
You can make all the comments you want. The Warrants are still coming and it will be less flight time for the regulars. Best taik with your Army brotheren. After 1992, Army commissioned officer could no longer become instructor pilots, specificially a Warrant career field. The Navy will take its sweet a** time but the flying Warrants are here to stay and they will multiply.
Hozer
Bunk22
Don't need to be a rocket scientist or NA/NFO to see what is instore for Naval Aviation and the Warrant Officer program. The test program will be a complete success. It will take approx 15-20 years before it will be fully implimented where 50% of the aviators both NA/NFO will be warrant. Just like the Army.
You can make all the comments you want. The Warrants are still coming and it will be less flight time for the regulars. Best taik with your Army brotheren. After 1992, Army commissioned officer could no longer become instructor pilots, specificially a Warrant career field. The Navy will take its sweet a** time but the flying Warrants are here to stay and they will multiply.
You are making too many assumptions.
You're making it sound foreboding and a little threatening. Almost chicken little style. Do tell us how you are an expert in this field and why you have such strong convictions about this. Please.
Indeed, don't have to be a rocket scientist but have to be a Naval Aviator to make the judgement calls you have. You are not a NA and make big assumptions. One of which is I said anything about the success or failure of the WO program. The sailing comment, knowing what a true NA would do. Are you kidding me
Right now, at this moment, you've got about as much credibility as a no talent ass clown. That might be giving you to much credit actually. Get back to us when and if you are accepted and make it through. Then make your judgement calls and what a true NA would do.I suspect the fellows you called out by name are not all that hurt by your disagreement. If they think it is worth their time they can explain the military personnel system to you (and associated costs, of course), which might cause you to take another look at your conclusions.
As a side note - if it were me, I wouldn't start an entry with "Don't need to be a rocket scientist" unless I intended to use spell check before actually posting.
EDIT: or on sober reflection, bunk might just spank you.
As a side note - if it were me, I wouldn't start an entry with "Don't need to be a rocket scientist" unless I intended to use spell check before actually posting.
EDIT: or on sober reflection, bunk might just spank you.
Time will tell. But if I mentioned several years ago the Navy would institute a Flying Warrant program like the Army, you would say get lost. What do you guys have against the Army's Warrant pilot program anyway?
Your Flag officers like what they saw in the Army's program and didn't ask for JO's input or opinion. Just get with the program, you just may like it. Besides, you have no choice.
Your Flag officers know what's best for Naval Aviation, they're tail hookers aren't they?
Your Flag officers like what they saw in the Army's program and didn't ask for JO's input or opinion. Just get with the program, you just may like it. Besides, you have no choice.
Your Flag officers know what's best for Naval Aviation, they're tail hookers aren't they?
No one here has anything against the Army flying WO program. It has zero to do with the Navy's program. They don't have tactical fast movers, carriers, etc. The programs are entirely different.
That's not the way things happen. Not at all.
Ridiculous comment.
Still waiting for a response for this post. http://www.airwarriors.com/forum/showpost.php?p=344774&postcount=109
OK, I'll play "Devils Advocate" here and give you the benefit of the doubt: would you please give us your professional credentials and the methodologies you used in reaching your conclusions ???
Very respectfully,
FOG