• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

The SHOW: Airlines still a "good gig"??

Griz882

Frightening children with the Griz-O-Copter!
pilot
Contributor

Jim123

DD-214 in hand and I'm gonna party like it's 1998
pilot
Almost all of the major brands (and many of the regionals that feed them) have had problems ramping back up to meet the summer demand. Now that it's back to school season and domestic leisure travel has eased back, it might give them a chance to catch up. It's a big puzzle and in this particular story the important is pilots qualified in specific combinations of airplane-crew position. Some of them hit the bottom of their bullpens because of extra busy holidays, major weather shutting down a hub for half a day and all the fallout from that, or cumulative effects of delays making crews timing out (which means an airplane gets stuck somewhere for a few hours or overnight).

Training is a bottleneck for a lot of airlines these last few months- mostly simulator capacity. Sims can run almost 24/7 (usually minus a maintenance period for a couple hours each day), sometimes that's what limits production. The sim instructor cadre can limit it too, those guys have a qualification matrix that involves steps in "growing" a new instructor, let alone one who can sign off checkrides. If you pull an experienced pilot off the line to be an instructor and your airline is short qualified captains in the airplane he or she is qualified in then that makes more short term pain. The instructor cadre can surge but they can also get burned out, have sick days, and otherwise be part of a complicated picture of plugging in the right qualified people to the right sim slots (so that the students aren't taking too long to finish training). Then another bottleneck can be qualified check airman availability, which has some similarities to optimizing a sim schedule.

Hindsight would have been either not give out so many buyouts and early retirements OR to restart the training departments a few months earlier. Either or both would have stocked up the bullpens much more robustly.

During covid and "quarantine," the airlines were trying to shore up market share by keeping routes open and utilizing gate slots (gate slots at some major airports are a pretty big deal with some weird rules). Sometimes that meant putting a small regional airliner on a route that would normally be flown by a narrow body airplane with twice as many seats, or larger.

This past summer the airlines shifted into building market share and they were quite ambitious about their scheduling and ticket sales volume (volume first, dollars later). Obviously this part hasn't all gone smoothly.


Hope that makes sense. Bottom-line-on-bottom: running a complicated business is complicated.
 
Last edited:

scoolbubba

Brett327 gargles ballsacks
pilot
Contributor
The smartest option would have been to suck up the sims required to keep all of us out on semi-paid leaves current and qualified. Letting currency lapse made it waaaaaay harder to plus back up to meet demand.
 

wink

War Hoover NFO.
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
The smartest option would have been to suck up the sims required to keep all of us out on semi-paid leaves current and qualified. Letting currency lapse made it waaaaaay harder to plus back up to meet demand.
AA offered a number of leave options. As I recall only the one year UNPAID leave and the early out for I think 62 and over, went unqualed. Seemed like the majority of guys were on shorter leaves that required doing recurrent home study and training along with landing sim as necessary. Those guys should have gone right back to work. @webmaster would know real numbers. He was one of the union dudes who essentially administered the leaves.
 

Randy Daytona

Cold War Relic
pilot
Super Moderator
AA seems to be dropping in terms of reliability and customer experience. Thoughts?

Speaking of American Airlines, news of a possible change to their Contract of Carriage.


If anyone has plans to travel to Europe, these are the compensation rules which EU airlines have to meet - which might provide an interesting comparison.

 

wink

War Hoover NFO.
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
Speaking of American Airlines, news of a possible change to their Contract of Carriage.


If anyone has plans to travel to Europe, these are the compensation rules which EU airlines have to meet - which might provide an interesting comparison.

I only read the article regarding the contract of carriage. Much ado about nothing . Near as I can tell there is no change in what he highlights.

Airlines have never been liable for being late. You have never been able to get a hotel on your own and expense the airline. Who would allow that? You would have everyone running to the Ritz vs the airport Marriot or Double Tree the airline has a contract with. And I am quite sure every other airline has the same policies he is singling out AA for. These things are largely driven by International Treaties and Conventions and Airline Transport Assoc member agreements.
 

insanebikerboy

Internet killed the television star
pilot
None
Contributor
Speaking of American Airlines, news of a possible change to their Contract of Carriage.


If anyone has plans to travel to Europe, these are the compensation rules which EU airlines have to meet - which might provide an interesting comparison.


The EU passenger travel rights have been pretty beneficial. We’ve gotten several flight refunds with no questions asked when they changed our flights around. It would be nice if the US carriers had something similar.
 

Griz882

Frightening children with the Griz-O-Copter!
pilot
Contributor

wink

War Hoover NFO.
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
I am pretty agnostic about removing screens at seats. It looks like people have no problem watching a full length movie on a tiny phone screen. On board entertainment is still available through a wireless web link, you just watch on your device. Even when we had screens in seatbacks, people would use their own device to watch what they downloaded. The problem with using your device instead of an installed screen is you may have charging cords interfering with your tray table drinks/snacks and making getting up to go the the lav a bit more difficult. Problem with screens is limited entertainment options. Not many on AA lately have appealed to me.

Whatever the expense and hassle with the first class seat installations, the photo in the article is misleading. No seat in first class has limited under seat carry on space. That photo is showing the area that would have been the foot well for the middle coach seat. no one sitting there in a FC cabin due to wider seats.

The conflict between USAirways and Native American passenger service and other processes is real. Very frequently USAirways thinking prevailed and proved to be disaster. I could never understand why management would give deference to the type of thinking and processes that came from an airline that had been in bankruptcy multiple times, had a consistent reputation for poor service and whos labor relations were best known for playing the pilot groups against each other for years.
 
Top