How do you know that? Maybe we are still flushing the existing ones out of their spider holes.
Does anyone have stats to prove something either way on this issue (short of the testimony of individual Iraqi citizens)?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How do you know that? Maybe we are still flushing the existing ones out of their spider holes.
The fact that we keep killing them, but their numbers don't go down any?
Which line of the Middle East census do they mark "terrorist", is it 14b or 14e? I think we all know how the numbers game can be played by those in the media.
Good one. I agree.Good one. I agree.
I think terrorists are created from a magical mixture of poverty, oppression, predisposition, and religon. I don't think seeing/knowing someone who is planning to kill others get killed first makes more terrorists.
Those damn terrorist witches and their evil magic ...
Path of least resistance. Its easier for those who desire martyrdom to go to Iraq than go to the US. They still get their 40 virgins and don't have to buy a plane ticket.
There is a fundamental difference my friend. Our military is fighting them over there; and burying an a$$ton of them. Yes, we are suffering losses too. But by use of this logic, pulling out would mean they would come to America to do blow people up. In this scenario, innocent men, women, and most importantly; children, lose their lives. Lets leave the fight overseas.
I couldn't agree more ... seriously ... when you have cancerous "cells" buried all around the world --- why would one particular oil-rich Middle Eastern country --- Iraq in this case --- become the nexus for the Islamic sui caedere of this world ???... The statement that Iraq is the central front in the GWOT is a handy piece of rhetoric, but that doesn't make it true.

I'm more concerned about going to Bangkok or Manila than Basrah ...![]()
Precisely, tactically we should be killing as many terrorists and suspected terrorists as we can, and finding out where the money is coming from and "stemming" the flow. (I'm looking at you Iran)
Or DC, St. Louis, New Orleans, Detroit ...
Please read for explanation, and the facts ...
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/5/29/132706.shtml
"The American city with the highest civilian death rate was New Orleans before Katrina - with a staggering 53.1 deaths per 100,000 - almost twice the death rate in Iraq."
. If you took a look the total number of attacks against US forces you would be at a loss to explain why there are not more casualties, the numbe rof attacks in Iraq dwarfs the casualties. The only reason the KIA and WIA numbers are much greater is because of the extraordinary force protection efforts of the US forces over there as well as the first rate, and extremely rapid, medical care.
, the last time I checked there were no IED's along Pennsylvania Ave......To say that Iraq ia less violent than DC is sheer stupidity, the last time I checked there were no IED's along Pennsylvania Ave......
No, but the average Iraqui citizen is allowed to own firearms for their protection, unlike people in DC...
LOL.
BTW, witches and Sadar both have bad teeth...