Speaking of which: Tommy Tuberville pledged to ‘donate every dime’ to veterans. He hasn’t. (WaPo)Would not have believed it had I not read the article. Extrordinary."Where do we get such men" - indeed. Now we know - lol!
Speaking of which: Tommy Tuberville pledged to ‘donate every dime’ to veterans. He hasn’t. (WaPo)Would not have believed it had I not read the article. Extrordinary."Where do we get such men" - indeed. Now we know - lol!
Speaking of which: Tommy Tuberville pledged to ‘donate every dime’ to veterans. He hasn’t. (WaPo)
I'm with you on your post. Not trying to argue about abortion, instead about the medical care process.
I take issue with the idea that we would have to have some sort of screening system in place before a CO could have orders written so a female member of their command could seek medical care out of state, to make sure she was meeting a state-specific set of rules on where and whether and for what situation they could travel. Who would adjudicate this? A state-assigned unit commissar?
Just females, of course.
I'm not a guardsman, but I'd see Title 32 money used like that easily snowballing into a huge partisan shitfight at the state level.Things get interesting when you also apply this to the ANG and ARNG. Can a commander put a soldier or airman on a few days of Title 10 orders? Can they spend state money to send a soldier or airman out of state to get the care they need on Title 32 orders?
I see this becoming a big issue quickly in a few states.
I’m sure this will be good for officer retention.
On a related subject, I thought this was interesting:I'm not a guardsman, but I'd see Title 32 money used like that easily snowballing into a huge partisan shitfight at the state level.
I think the court decision is rather limited. Even yokels like Abbot aren’t going to “kill the fatted calf” of federally supplied helicopters, vehicles, and gear. I do believe it is time to rework the whole Army, Army Reserve, Army National Guard (as well as the AF and their part-timers) by eliminating the reserves and placing them into the “National Guard” with federal control but state immediate access and some limited control such as the selection of Adjutant Generals and other state staff. We really don’t need five land component commands, and five and a half “air forces.”On a related subject, I thought this was interesting:
Court ruling could overturn federal control of the National Guard
A federal judge suggested that key federal oversight mechanisms are unconstitutional. Now what?
![]()
Court ruling could overturn federal control of the National Guard
The National Guard has changed dramatically from its state militia roots, but so have the courts that will decide its fate.www.armytimes.com
On a related subject, I thought this was interesting:
Court ruling could overturn federal control of the National Guard
A federal judge suggested that key federal oversight mechanisms are unconstitutional. Now what?
![]()
Court ruling could overturn federal control of the National Guard
The National Guard has changed dramatically from its state militia roots, but so have the courts that will decide its fate.www.armytimes.com
I think the court decision is rather limited. Even yokels like Abbot aren’t going to “kill the fatted calf” of federally supplied helicopters, vehicles, and gear. I do believe it is time to rework the whole Army, Army Reserve, Army National Guard (as well as the AF and their part-timers) by eliminating the reserves and placing them into the “National Guard” with federal control but state immediate access and some limited control such as the selection of Adjutant Generals and other state staff. We really don’t need five land component commands, and five and a half “air forces.”
Except it's a lot easier to use grunts for things like crowd control or post-hurricane relief at the state level than intel weenies.Having dealt with both reserve and National Guard folks periodically through my whole career I would argue the exact opposite needs to happen, with the more combat arms units of the Guard transitioning to the reserves for several reasons.
Beat me to it…that and a “National Guard” based system allows for state level access without having to risk political pretty-pleases in the event of an emergency.Except it's a lot easier to use grunts for things like crowd control or post-hurricane relief at the state level than intel weenies.
Except it's a lot easier to use grunts for things like crowd control or post-hurricane relief at the state level than intel weenies.
Also there is a lot of merit in the flexibility of a Guardsman to be on orders other than title 10. Reservists don't have that option.Except it's a lot easier to use grunts for things like crowd control or post-hurricane relief at the state level than intel weenies.
The VAQ community has entered the chatThe best thing about the guard is homesteading.