exNavyOffRec
Well-Known Member
This is another case of people changing and evolving as time goes by, people can change their minds. He was well thought of by his more liberal colleagues.There were possibly a lot of renamings during the commissioning of private vessels into USS, USNS, or USCG service at the outset of WW1 and WW2, but I’m not able to look it up right now.
I just read Stennis’ bio on wikipedia. Nothing strikes me as very worthy of an aircraft carrier. He did not serve in the Navy or accomplish anything particularly courageous in his life. Obviously, the Navy and DoD have often played (and will continue to play) to egos in Congress to achieve tactical appropriations victories. But yeah, let’s rename it, why not. It doesn’t cost anything to rename it.
[U.S. Rep. Norm Dicks, D-Belfair, served with Stennis on defense appropriations, and remembers a meticulous leader.
"He was a tremendous person," Dicks said. "He'd make us go through the budget line item by line item. He was deeply admired by those on the (Capitol) Hill."]