No more CQs?

[Brett327]

I’m glad I had such an impact on this thread.

I’m disappointed that the use of an anachronistic term for our most dangerous adversary caused some of you to clutch your pearls.

Who is clutching pearls? The more important question is whether the PLAN has PLM in their jets, and how their own CQ programs are set up. Moreover, would @Hair Warrior 's plan to regulate online personal data prevent China from stealing the source code for the F/A-18 FCS software?

 

[Jim123]

Who is clutching pearls? The more important question is whether the PLAN has PLM in their jets

Maybe we can give them the Stuxnet edition.

 

[Hair Warrior]

Unsubscribe

 

[Hopeful Hoya]

One of my T-45 paddles was notorious for going on diatribes in briefs that could easily last 20+ mins (for example, going from talking about how to properly execute a wings-level transition to off-color stories about crematoriums).

Part of me wonders if he lurks on AW somewhere and is the one responsible for starting some of these epic thread drifts...

 

[Treetop Flyer]

I was highlighting that both the term, and the Limbaugh are anachronisms.

In our military, we have people chafing about the words we use to describe the single most dangerous adversary we face. I feel great about our future.

 

[scoolbubba]

I tend not to worry about negative connotations referring to a country of people determined to put ours in second place, or worse.


The less CHICOMs in this world, the better. We ain't saints, but they're fucking locusts.

 

[Treetop Flyer]

I tend not to worry about negative connotations referring to a country of people determined to put ours in second place, or worse.


The less CHICOMs in this world, the better. We ain't saints, but they're fucking locusts.

On the bright side they are putting “ugly American” to rest as tourists.

 

[Brett327]

In our military, we have people chafing about the words we use to describe the single most dangerous adversary we face. I feel great about our future.

Someone was talking about pearl clutching a few posts back.

 

[Treetop Flyer]

Someone was talking about pearl clutching a few posts back.

I’m proud of you for taking me off ignore.

 

[nittany03]

One of my T-45 paddles was notorious for going on diatribes in briefs that could easily last 20+ mins (for example, going from talking about how to properly execute a wings-level transition to off-color stories about crematoriums).

Part of me wonders if he lurks on AW somewhere and is the one responsible for starting some of these epic thread drifts...

The quotes that are going through my head right now from T-45 CQ back in the day . . . unfortunately, they're all kind of "you had to be there" funny.

"Is that . . . Aramaic???"

 

[wink]

I tend not to worry about negative connotations referring to a country of people determined to put ours in second place, or worse.

And enslave nearly 1.5 billion of their own people and will undoubtedly do so to Hong Kong and may very well the Republic of China. Oops. Was I supposed to say Taiwan?

 

[Hair Warrior]

I’m proud of you for taking me off ignore.

Wait, how do I get put on ignore?

 

[taxi1]

I’m proud of you for taking me off ignore.

Show me on the doll where Brett touched you

 

[Hair Warrior]

Show me on the doll where Brett touched you

Why does his doll look like a Marxist guerrilla?

 

[taxi1]

Why does his doll look like a Marxist guerrilla?

You know what it says on his ass?

MADE IN CHINA