Remember the ARMY AND AIR FORCE BULD MWR FACILITIES FIRST THEN THEY BUILD HOUSING THEN THEY BUILD THE REST OF THE OPERATIONAL BASE. The Navy and marines build the runway and base first then housing then MWR facilities.
I'd always heard this as well, but...
Lucky me, in my aviation-purgatory shore duty, I have now learned the reality:
Big Navy uses installation budgets as the slush fund for warfighting capabilities. When things are tight, installations get robbed first to fund shipbuilding.
Navy MWR is required to break even overall. The only moneymakers in MWR are golf courses and marinas. The major overhead on a golf course is, of course, grounds maintenance, so that's the first thing cut in order to keep single sailor programs afloat.
The Navy has sea duty and shore duty; you can go from flying on sea duty, to being a detailer on shore duty. Then, before you redeploy, you go back through training to update quals, then through workups to establish proficiency. So your shore job doesn't necessarily have to be the same as your sea job.
The Air Force has nothing like the sea duty/shore duty concept. An airman who does landscape maintenance (on a golf course) in the States, will do landscape maintenance when he deploys to a war zone. Therefore, the Air Force ties money to maintain that golf course to the ability to keep that airman trained to deploy (read - "readiness").
So, the Navy becomes "well-rounded", while the Air Force has a giant helmet fire whenever they meet a situation not covered by instructions.
I hate myself for knowing all this.
