"Small arms are responsible for over half a million deaths per year, including 300,000 in armed conflict and 200,000 more from homicides and suicides."
"Small arms and light weapons destabilize regions; spark, fuel and prolong conflicts; obstruct relief programmes; undermine peace initiatives; exacerbate human rights abuses; hamper development; and foster a "culture of violence"."
And I suppose the small arms just leap up and do it all themselves?
These thinkers in the government and the UN never actually put any thought into the matter: it's maniacal @ssholes that abuse, obstruct, terrorize, and foster violence. How the hell can anybody have ANY chance whatsoever of being free of people like that if their means to level the playing field in self-defense is taken away? How do you defend your rights and freedoms when you've been stripped of your means of doing so?
Why does ANYBODY (other than someone who wants to abuse and have control of others) think doing away with firearms is a good idea?
Do-gooders never seem to do anybody any good...
(edited to fix typos)