Kind of far…far out. Russia is in dire straits right now, economically a mess, militarily weakened (to an extreme level) and not ready for a larger war. This is approaching fantasy land.
The voice of reason! Thank you
@Griz882
@Griz882 - I don't think it's that much of a fantasy. Think of the win win Putin gets (this is the argument that Ukraine and the Baltic States are making now to suggest it's realistic, among their other intelligence):
1. Putin wants to win in Ukraine. He is rapidly losing out on people willing to join and having to increase wages and benefits ($$) for recruiting new Soldiers and paying out dead ones' families (their version of SGLI).
2. So he wants a conscription where he can stop raising wages, but knows politically this is unsavory for him.
3. Do a small attack on a small town in the Baltics. If NATO responds he can say "SEE! I told you all along NATO was going to do this! Our guys were slaughtered! We have to respond!" In his mind, political winds swell around support against fighting. Conscription ensues, and more people are sent to the meat grinder in Ukraine.
4. OR - if NATO doesn't respond - particularly because the US doesn't commit forces ("oh, it's just a small Lithuanian/Estonian/Latvian town") or assist outside of intel, but also western European governments that don't feel threatened, think France, Germany, Spain, Portugal, UK, etc. also don't commit to responding - then NATO truly looks like a paper tiger and the value of article 5 is at the very least heavily reduced if the alliance continues to exist in anything but paper.