navgovie
IW Officer
I wanted to touch on this point as it is a very important nuance that few seem to grasp. The OCS process is a forge that (hopefully) filters out those unworthy or unable to perform the duties of an officer, and prepares candidates (typically with little experience) to be leaders in the Navy.I guess I just don't understand.
When I went to OCS I didn't do any interviews whatsoever. I just applied and gave the recruiter my transcripts, statement, etc and a letter of rec from my boss and off I went 8 months later. No interviews needed.
So I am just kind of confused about why we put so much weight on interviews when active duty doesnt even really do them.
The DCO process is very different. It takes leaders in their given fields, and turns them into Navy officers. A tremendous amount of vetting must be done upfront. The Navy does not get months in a controlled environment to analyze and vet that the DCO is indeed already a leader, or that they possess the critical and rare skills the Navy needs immediately (think medical, cyber, etc). DCO candidates are granted a commission based upon their critical skillsets, and their proven leadership skills in their industry. They are expected to perform and lead day one, and are typically air dropped into a unit without receiving so much as a day of formal military education (they do eventually get some). As such, every vetting mechanism in place is used to verify their skill, experience, and integrity, to include in person interviews.
For those who went to OCS, initial interviews were unnecessary...you ultimately had ~13 weeks of "interviews" at every inspection, every formation, every review, and every class you took.