• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

CORTRAMID West T-34 flight

KBayDog

Well-Known Member
And why are we scrapping them again? Surplus auction them, make them have experimental certs to CYA if needed....

Don't know anything about the "low safe" program for fast-movers, but if the intent is to have essentially a spotter aircraft for ranges, is there any reason why they can't continue to be used for that purpose with stricter NATOPS limits (make aerobatics verboten, limit AOB, etc.)? If that's no bueno, what about transferring them to other agencies, much like the OV-10s out there?

Hell, our Phrogs were apparently too bent for us, but DynCorp thinks they're A-OK...
 

Gatordev

Well-Known Member
pilot
Site Admin
Contributor
Don't know anything about the "low safe" program for fast-movers, but if the intent is to have essentially a spotter aircraft for ranges, is there any reason why they can't continue to be used for that purpose with stricter NATOPS limits (make aerobatics verboten, limit AOB, etc.)? If that's no bueno, what about transferring them to other agencies, much like the OV-10s out there?

Hell, our Phrogs were apparently too bent for us, but DynCorp thinks they're A-OK...

They're doing just that. Many/much of the T-34s are just too old to continue. They're cracking wing spars and their airframes have been over-g'ed too many times that they've hit FLM. However, some out there still have some life left in them, and those are the ones going to the various fleet commands to replace ones that are either too old or that were needed to augment the TRACOM.

I would guess that, with maybe the exception of the Phrog, most planes that were sent to other entities didn't have anywhere near the hours and, more importantly, the fatigue that the T-34 has. Why would an agency buy something they'd have to re-spar anyway?
 

KBayDog

Well-Known Member
I would guess that, with maybe the exception of the Phrog, most planes that were sent to other entities didn't have anywhere near the hours and, more importantly, the fatigue that the T-34 has. Why would an agency buy something they'd have to re-spar anyway?

True. I forgot that, back in the day, we didn't fly airframes for three to five decades before retiring them.
 
Top