Fester, I'm fairly certain was with us enduring the JFK
Pain-ex. Maybe on a different small boy in the group?
Next cruise, on IKE.
Fester, I'm fairly certain was with us enduring the JFK
Pain-ex. Maybe on a different small boy in the group?
Next cruise, on IKE.
...I was next door on CG-69 aka "The Love Boat" (and no, that's not why I was COD'd off early)
Do you realize how long they have been talking about getting rid of VOR and TACAN stations? I'm sure the time is nearing, but I don't see it happening that quickly. We still have NDB's scattered around the PNW and AK, and that has been an obsolete system (aside from their use in parallel with ILS) for longer than I have been alive, short of maybe island use.
JPALS cometh (w/DGPS) and Link 16 provideth alternatives to TACAN, but the E-2 is usually there to help lost souls.
But not for everyone (Link 16 nor E-2). But wait, you say, the Romeo has Link 16 (I think)! Sadly there will still be plenty of legacy birds flying around that have nothing but Tacan and an internal nav system.
Meat's failsafe method of finding a carrier.
1. Turn on radar.
2. Look for biggest storm/rain shower.
3. Carrier will be directly under it.
Why do shoes always steer for the worst weather in the area when aircraft are airborne?
If I had $0.05 for every time I heard that. Hmm, SIPR email - gotta have someone's email address, mIRC - gotta know the channel they're on, CAS websites? Have to have a semi-reliable internet connection for that. I've experienced what MasterBates has experienced more than once in my career.How about SIPR email, or the CAS website, or mIRC? Most airwings post that stuff to their CAS sites. Lots of ways to get that info without waiting for it to be "pushed" to you.
If I had $0.05 for every time I heard that. Hmm, SIPR email - gotta have someone's email address, mIRC - gotta know the channel they're on, CAS websites? Have to have a semi-reliable internet connection for that. I've experienced what MasterBates has experienced more than once in my career.
And it's not a lack of trying to get the info.
Brett,
Deal with the connectivity issues of being on a small boy, and not being able to walk to CVIC and ask "hey what dude does this function" and get back to me about it.
It's not for lack of trying that we didn't get info.
Most of the guys in the CVW could give 2 shits less about the HSL and HC guys in the screen, HS included.
How in the world do you get the freq for BTN 1 when you have to go land on the CVN?I know you LAMPS guys have that freq because I hear you on it all the time. The CVN has the same connectivity issues everyone else does. We're all using the same satellite. I used to mIRC with various guys on our shotgun all the time. If you can't mIRC with someone on the CVN, or figure out the email address of anyone in the HS squadron, then you fail at being in the Navy.
End of story.
Brett
At sea, TACAN is great when you are only concerned with finding your ship. Then, as many HSL dets can attest to, there comes a time when you have to MEDEVAC someone or divert (wx, gas, EP, etc.) into a country where the only TACAN in the country is your ship. Plenty of VOR or GPS nav routes/approaches, and doesn't matter how good your EGI's are or how many satellites in state 5 you have, you can't legally or reliably fly those routes/approaches or you can't tune up the xmiters. Pretty ridiculous. Because the mantra of so many is "you're never going to do that" we can't do it because "they" won't let us, the prophecy is self fulfilling. (The other mantra that is closely related is "that's the way we've always done it.")
If I am catching your drift, then I agree that big Nav needs to quickly get up to speed with GPS integration. It is absurd that we can't "legally" use the fully functional GPS/INS suite for primary nav in a $20+ million training jet, yet every joe in a C182 with a civilian market glass cockpit can shoot GPS down to mins all day long. Pretty bad when you look in AOPA mags and think "damn I wish we had something that nice"....