The whole Birther thing was racist. Nothing to do with policies.White guy says Obama had bad policies as president, blacks (and liberals) say the white guy must be racist if he didn't like Obama's policies.
Bull shit. It had to do with wishful thinking to get rid of Obama as President because they didn't like his policies.The whole Birther thing was racist. Nothing to do with policies.
Exactly. Much more succinct then my posts.The reality is that racism is far from being mostly white on black. It knows no one color. Anyone who grows up poor knows this. Unfortunately our educational infrastructure has been hijacked by radical ideologues who hide their impotence behind feigned righteous indignation.
I'll respond to this with an excerpt from an interview with the DiAngelo:My counter without even reading it
“We have to stop thinking about racism simply as someone who says the N-word,” she says. “This book is centered in the white western colonial context, and in that context white people hold institutional power.” This means understanding that racism is a system rather than just a slur; it is prejudice plus power. And in Britain and the US at least, it is designed to benefit and privilege whiteness by every economic and social measure. Everyone has a racial bias but, as DiAngelo is determined to establish, “when you back a group’s collective bias with lingering authority and institutional control, it is transformed”.
That is why she is scathing of those who claim “reverse racism” exists; after all, people of color can show prejudice against white people. It is equally condemnable, but this form of discrimination does not come with systemic privilege and so is not racism as per the modern definition.
According to her strict definition of racism, it doesn't exist in America. Not only are there absolutely no formal institutional policies regarding the mistreatment of people because of their race, having one is specifically forbidden by law.She also argues that what HAL and others call "reverse racism" is really prejudice.
I'll respond to this with an excerpt from an interview with the DiAngelo:
She also argues that what HAL and others call "reverse racism" is really prejudice.
Edit: In addition, the irony is not lost on me that HAL is the author's target audience for this book.
While not directly related to racism in the military, I fear this event will stoke the fires of racism and hatred that we'll be dealing with for awhile, regardless of you you are and where you work . . . .
If you think that was a personal attack, what would you call this?Let's see if the Mods censor you for the personal attack.....
So this is just another liberal "white privilege" piece.
Or this?Launching you to Uranus. It’ll be familiar to you.
Or...Nobody can explain anything to Brett. He’s omniscient- just ask him....
Or...I see the village’s idiot has returned.
Or...Says the guy who continually throws out pompous arrogant holier-than-thou bullshit all the time.
Or...Keep digging. Maybe soon you'll bury yourself and relieve us from your misery.
Or maybe we just don’t give a shit about what you post.
It’s that simple.
If you think that was a personal attack, what would you call this?
Or this?
Or...
Or...
Or...
Or...
That's just the last couple of weeks. I think you give people you dislike a hard time here, which to me is fine, but it comes across as pretty lame when you cry foul when opponents so the same.
The Mods have censored me on occasion yet never censor those that post the same way toward me. I want fairness. If they leave my post (all not just some) alone, then I'll not complain about posts attacking against me. It's that simple.it comes across as pretty lame when you cry foul when opponents so the same.
Looks like it’s mostly anger at LE.I wonder if the anger will be directed at whites and asians given that who was involved in this.
Looks like it’s mostly anger at LE.