,...to that special breed of sky devil....
The SH-60B entered operational service in 1984 giving the 60 28yrs of service to the Navy. If the 60R/S stick around as long as the 60B, then the airframe will have been in service for almost 60yrs.Yeah, it's called the F/A-18A-D. 27 and 30 years for the Phantom in USN/USMC service respectively. We are now at 29 years and counting for the Hornet in USN service.....same year of "birth" as meUSMC will have been flying Hornets for as long as they flew Phantoms next year. That's including the service the Phantoms gave purely in reserve squadrons, so operationally, their service life has already been exceeded by the legacy Hornet.
Overall service, obviously the Phantom still wins since the AF still uses them as drones, but since you specified USN/USMC
Hey, that Great Santini character was a Fox-Four-Phantom driver, just like this old 'Squid' was."....known and feared throughout the world.....Marine.
To all squids and rust-pickers!!!!"
-excerpt from The Great Santini
Hey, that Great Santini character was a Fox-Four-Phantom driver, just like this old 'Squid' was.
Hey Cat, hows come Santini was flying a 'Sader in the movie (or in the book, can't 'member which)?
BzB
He upgraded.Hey Cat, hows come Santini was flying a 'Sader in the movie (or in the book, can't 'member which)?
BzB
Or a gun . . . not only for Air-to-Air, but also CAS, CSAR, Flak-suppression, and general shoot 'em up stuff!............ The shame is that the Navy (unlike the USAF w/ the F-4E) never put a multi-mode radar in its Phantoms so that they could become serious strike-fighters before we even used the term. ...........
The F-4 was one of the greater "unrealized potential" a/c in Naval Air history, IMHO. True, it was designed as an interceptor and became a good ACM a/c (if flown properly) and a good day air-to-mud platform. The shame is that the Navy (unlike the USAF w/ the F-4E) never put a multi-mode radar in its Phantoms so that they could become serious strike-fighters before we even used the term. Able to carry 12,000lbs of bombs, a supersonic, all-weather, air-to-air & air-to-mud Phantom would have been a wonderful return on our investment in this a/c. At the time, we were still stuck in the "fighter" & "attack" communities mindset, one that we could no longer afford by the 90's. FWIW.
Just a curiosity question...but...did the F-4 have the smack to go supersonic carrying the full air to mud load?
Never did it, but I am pretty sure it could.Just a curiosity question...but...did the F-4 have the smack to go supersonic carrying the full air to mud load?
Until the RO started to scream. (and they wanted to be low, too).How low are you talking Cat?