Natops
I have a question that could be fielded by you guys pretty quickly and smartly, so I'm gonna ask it. I've never had to deal with, nor have I ever heard of NATOPS until about 3 weeks ago. I took 2 AH-64s to Camp LeJune, New River, and completed training on the range there. After We landed for weather between us and Ft Bragg, I went to base ops to file and get a weather brief for us to return to Bragg. My intent was to fly around the nasty thunderstorm that was isolated to our west and basically fly southwest, then turn back to the northwest to get back into Bragg. While filing our 175, we requested our 175-1 and has the E6 behind the counter looked at my flight plan, the briefer informed me that I would not be able to be briefed and I was not allowed to file VFR. My aircraft is not qualified for IMC, but I can file IFR if I absolutely need to, but I was a little stunned that I was being told by an E6 weather briefer of what I can and cannot do due to the Convective SIGMET that was about to expire, and his general judgement based on his assessment of the weather. Professionally, I feel it is the final judgement of the Air Mission Commander and the Pilot in Command to determine, based on the brief he or she is given, whether or not it is safe to take off and execute the route of flight or the mission you are trying to accomplish. While we sat outside Base Ops, we watched AH-1s and CH-53s take off and land around the area, clearly not on ITOs, IFR clearances, or any type of IFR approach. So my questions are: who is NATOPS? What is the general concept of weather briefing and authority and how that works in the USN/USMC? And Does the USN/USMC rotarywing file IFR a lot more often that VFR and is it a desired method to file IFR, only to cancel your clearance later and continue VFR?
Thanks for the explanations in advance.