That's alright, HSCS' policy is to criticize and complain, regardless of what the facts might be.
Brett
-
Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?
Go here:
Edit Account Details and Profile
MH-60R info
- Thread starter Prashant Patel
- Start date
That's alright, HSCS' policy is to criticize and complain, regardless of what the facts might be.
Brett
Nope, I didn't even know there was one out there. I was in 1555 all morning the ran to the airport.
Don't know the specifics of the R's interior, but it's probably done the same way the Bravo does it... You can fit a litter in the Bravo w/ all it's gear, you just lose a seat (or two, I can't remember). To second Master's comment, I know of HSL dets that took out their launcher once they chopped into 5th fleet. More room for the sniper(s) and little need for the launcher. Does it screw up the T&R? Who knows...I leave such questions to Ops guys.
MasterBates
Well-Known Member
We jsut don't report it. That was my answer as an OPS guy.
Well no because PG is not a primary mission. If it were, we'd fly with 2 AWs in the back. Our primary mission only involves one AW, hence why we usually fly with one. Thanks for pointing out the obvious. If indeed the mission changes, don't you think its likely the manning requirements will also change to reflect it?
It would be interesting to see what the Romeo ROC/POE looks like and see if it's truly an issue. So hscs, is HSC planning on detting to the CVN as well, in order to support PG? I've always been a bit fuzzy on that plan.
Deploying w/ enough AWs and having enough AWs w/in the squadron are too different animals. Since the HSM plan is for the whole squadron to deploy (a la HS), then the AW manning issue might be less of an issue. Again, not sure what the revised plan is.
Deploying w/ enough AWs and having enough AWs w/in the squadron are too different animals. Since the HSM plan is for the whole squadron to deploy (a la HS), then the AW manning issue might be less of an issue. Again, not sure what the revised plan is.
The HS squadrons become HSC squadrons when they transition -- they will have 8 a/c -- 6 on the big deck and 2 on the combat food ship. That leaves the 60R guys to take over all of the SSC after the retirement of the S-3. We'll see how the plan is executed once HS-8 makes the transition.
I do suspect that the -60R guys will have to do PG -- once in a blue moon (if the HSC squadron is having maint trouble), but I don't suspect that a manning document will change to make HSM do PG all of the time.
I do suspect that the -60R guys will have to do PG -- once in a blue moon (if the HSC squadron is having maint trouble), but I don't suspect that a manning document will change to make HSM do PG all of the time.
Stop complaining hscs. That's all you do. there is only one person on this site that knows things.
You two are like peas in a pod. I'm just curious what the HSC community is doing to embitter people to such an extent.
Brett
Pfft, I don't know *everything*...