I feel like this is an extremely unfair assessment on an individual.
GPA is a very small indication of someone and their abilities.
cause let’s be serious- the guys that go to the academy, through college with parents paying for them, scholarship, etc are going to have a better opportunity for a higher GPA compared to the individual who worked 20-30 hours a week in addition to class work and labs.
I know guys who worked and had very low GPAs for that reason who went on to become very successful and do well in and out of the military and I know guys who had 3.8 GPAS in Aero Engineering from USNA fail out of API.
It’s not like the individual you’re talking too is a criminal with a criminal paper trail. They’re a world class athlete who now wants to serve.
On paper they look like a world class athlete who doesn't have the capability to achieve academically.
This has been told to me throughout my entire career- You're only as good as your paper trail says you are.
All boards are paper boards. Everyone knows folks who have gotten a P or two because they didn't follow the golden path, or because their leadership didn't give them the right kind of paperwork, or because of a velvet dagger, or whatever have you. That's life in the military- is it not?
You're not wrong though; I had a low GPA when I came in (2.9) and have one okay for myself, all things considered.
However, the only reason I got in was because in 2008/2009 the Marine Corps had a huge plus up in manpower. Even then, I don't think someone with a sub 2.0 is going to get into OCS off the street.
BTW- the only place where boards aren't simply who's paper trail is better? The Guard.