If I read this right, your saying the A through D Hornet wasn't needed, SSOO since I can say this with "nearly" pure anonymity, you're either an old steam gauge sim instructor who still thinks the A-4 is the end all/be all of jet aircraft and using the HUD is a crutch, OOORRRR, your f_cking smoking crack, so which is it?in my humble opinion the A thru C models bought little that wasn't already available on the A-6, A-7 & F-14.
Ya'll smile when you say that, Pilgrim.If I read this right, your saying .... you're an old steam gauge (guy) who still thinks the A-4 is the end all/be all of jet aircraft .....
Ya'll smile when you say that, Pilgrim.
Then I beat ya .... as it didn't even get 1 post further .... beware the wily Bogey. :icon_winkI knew this thread wouldn't get 3 posts further without you picking up on that....![]()
I was actually pretty serious about the Super x 3 Hornet, I remember years ago watching one of those Super Hornet roll out videos (on vhs, lol) and they were talking about the future of the bug all the way out to Block IV which, from the artists conception, was a blended wing body... But this was 10-11 years ago, and I haven't found any other information since.I'm curious as to what the Boeing "sixth generation" will be. I'm thinking UCAV. I guess Boeing is saying the Navy should save some money so it can afford the really good stuff in 2024.
RBI grants you a non-exclusive licence to access and use the Materials for your personal purposes. You may not reproduce or distribute any part of the content for commercial purposes.
..... the Super Block II+ Hornet....
If I read this right, your saying the A through D Hornet wasn't needed, SSOO since I can say this with "nearly" pure anonymity, you're either an old steam gauge sim instructor who still thinks the A-4 is the end all/be all of jet aircraft and using the HUD is a crutch, OOORRRR, your f_cking smoking crack, so which is it?
F-18 A-D with a combat load carried less ordinance than an A-6 (Go ahead, make the Pk/jet to DMPI ratio argument, I'll counter that too), was underpowered, didn't carry enough gas (so we went from 1+40 cycles to 1+15 or less, had almost no bringback. It's big selling point was that it was ready for PGMs, but then they hung the LANTIRN on the Tomcat and the Hornet wasn't much more than a short legged CAP.
It is easy to land on the ship and great in a knife fight. We do one of those a lot, haven't done the other in 30+ years.
I'm disappointed that you feel you need anonymity to propose your points and I don't think you should lob F-Bombs at your elders!![]()
Boeing has a plan to sell generation "4.75" Super Hornets (as opposed to gen. 4.5 we have now) to tide the Navy over until a 6th generation Fighter comes out in 2024 (which I'd assume would have to be a Super-Super-Super Hornet to make that timeline - Engineering Change of Proposal must be the golden ticket for defense contractors)
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/gene... Generation Fighter With Block 3 Super Hornet
That's Mark Fox...not Mike Fox.
Well thought outI won't compare E-2's and Awacs because I have never sat in either.