No.
I'm saying that an order is lawful until proven otherwise. So if someone is going to disobey an order on the grounds that it's unlawful, they have some homework to do. Aka it's an 'affirmative defense.' The people who were discharged for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine were dealt with appropriately, pending further appeal.
However, that homework has resulted in courts ruling that the order was unlawful. Or rather, the government playing damage control to avoid further litigation because it knows it was unlawful. And part of being in the military is that you accept the policy decisions of civilian leadership. So you gotta get over the fact that the policy has changed. Brett is chest-thumping, but if he were still AD in command then he would color inside the lines... because almost no GOFO (advised by senior JAGs) have stood up to the policy.
So those SVMs stood their ground and won. That's commendable. I would take anyone that committed to their moral compass on my team any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
As a food for thought: the only person to have served time for the Mai Lai massacre was a 2LT, who was later pardoned. The only person who had a moral compass that day was a SGT who shot himself in the foot to bow out of the incident.... everyone else was 'just following orders.' Furthermore, no American was jailed for the unrestricted submarine warfare crimes in WWII, unlike German Admirals.
If you are active duty, then you accept the authority of civilian leadership to make policy decisions. Which means that if you disagree with their handling of COVID-19 vaccine deniers, you are wrong and they are right. If the administration changes parties in 2 years and that flips, then you also need to flip your opinion... or else again you are wrong, and they are right. You may go to jail for following the orders of one administration over the other... that's the price of a quarter million dollar a year salary.
If POTUS says you shall discharge every transgendered servicemember because they pose a threat to national security, you say aye sir. If the next administration lets them back in, you say aye sir. And again, no GOFO is making noise over it. If you think it's illegal, then argue it at your article 92 trial.
If one President says that you shall waterboard 'non-combatants' and put them into 3x3 carboard boxes, and subsequently use SERE to experiment with 'enhanced interrogation' then you do it. If the next one says that's torture, then you stop. The only person to ever stand trial for it was a whistleblower.
I want you to reconcile a vaccine denier with people who willingly tortured brown-skinned people for worshipping another religion. The almighty Brett as a JO decided that he aligned with the organization's moral values, and I decided to join them after the fact. We've all got blood on our hands.
So yeah, these things are VERY political, and we have a very long, ugly history. Welcome to the suck. Don't like it? Vote with your feet.