Meanwhile, on active duty...
View attachment 44943
Meanwhile, on active duty...
View attachment 44943
One thing that is sticking out like a sore thumb is how many GOFOs are willing to hand-waive away performance requirements to get technology delivered faster. Yet there is no talk of thoughtfully reviewing why those requirements exist or the overhauling the process that led them to believe that particular specification is bloated.If it were credible, yes.
This kind of seesaw performative politics is exactly why I exited the Defense sector- I was tired of being conveniently labeled as “the problem” while every solution I busted my ass to come up with was roundly ignored by USG or so mired in process and under-resourced there was no way forward.
Good luck, it’s a tough space to be in.
Didn’t they already kill the JCIDS process? That was the ultimate source.there is no talk of thoughtfully reviewing why those requirements exist or the overhauling the process that led them to believe that particular specification is bloated.
Maybe? Again, not the messaging. It's more along the lines of "we asked for this thing that has a 1000nm range but it can only go 900nm. Good enough, get it fielded!"