The indymedia article is hilarious... I love all the slanted word choices and code words they use in the story:
How much of a "dialogue" do you think that was? I'm guessing that this "dialogue" consisted of the protestors screaming until they ran out of breath while the recruiters stood patiently with their arms folded. Plus, given that the entire idea of the demonstration was to shut down the recruiters and keep them from getting their message out (as opposed to a true "protest," which would consist of them demonstrating in such a way as to express opposition without directly interfering with the recruiters), it doesn't look like they really wanted a "dialogue."
I think the author is trying to say that the protestors are misunderstood... they were actually fighting on behalf of innocent brochures and recruiting videos from the tyranny of being kept on a table at the job fair.
Spot the contradiction here...
If this guy ever changes his political affiliation, he'll have a great career writing for the Washington Times.(/cheap shot to maintain "liberal" credentials)