SHARP was upgraded to 5.1 over the weekend, and looks to be a mild improvement over 5.0. But what I cannot abide is the fact that it now requires a "strong" password with comparison checks for the last 4 passwords. That adds on to the pile of passwords and logins that I've got to keep track of, to include:
NMCI
ACOL
NKO
GTCC
NALCOMIS
All with different complexity, aging and similarity requirements for their passwords - not to mention that there are now 6 completely different logins. To save time lost trying to remember or reset passwords, I now have a 3x5 card with all of the login/passwords on there (save ACOL - that one is memorized), which pretty much defeats the purpose of having logins and passwords, but damn. I only have so much room for truly random information, especially information that changes every 90 days.
Why don't these programs use the CAC card for authentication? If the developers of SHARP were going to change the password requirements, why not just change it to CAC authentication? (NATEC does actually do this for e-pubs... but then requires yet ANOTHER login and password.)
Any thoughts?
NMCI
ACOL
NKO
GTCC
NALCOMIS
All with different complexity, aging and similarity requirements for their passwords - not to mention that there are now 6 completely different logins. To save time lost trying to remember or reset passwords, I now have a 3x5 card with all of the login/passwords on there (save ACOL - that one is memorized), which pretty much defeats the purpose of having logins and passwords, but damn. I only have so much room for truly random information, especially information that changes every 90 days.
Why don't these programs use the CAC card for authentication? If the developers of SHARP were going to change the password requirements, why not just change it to CAC authentication? (NATEC does actually do this for e-pubs... but then requires yet ANOTHER login and password.)
Any thoughts?