Then why would it be difficult to get an M9 in CA and easy to get an FS92?
an M-16 and an AR-15 are night and day differnt. Most of the time though its just a differnce in paperwork.
The first M-16's to be delivered to DOD went to the Air Force and were actually marked AR-15, but thats neither here nore there.
I still don't understand CA's hangup on having a magazine that holds more than 10 rounds.
That's because the AR-15 of 1950-whatever was a COMPLETELY different animal than the AR-15 of today.
Theres a couple hundred AR-15 marked M-16s registered to civilians. I'm lucky enough to know one. The insides of the 1970s-80s M-16A1 and the insides of the earlier model AR marked M-16s are identical other than the slab side. I've handled both. I'm interested to know what you think makes them a completely different animal? Other than the slab side of course.
I know; i was thinking like a pet or something![]()