1. Yes 2. No.............just like the rest of the Federal Government.Uhhhhh, should they be? Or better yet, could they be?
1. Yes 2. No.............just like the rest of the Federal Government.Uhhhhh, should they be? Or better yet, could they be?
You're funny.They're aiming for full audit ability by 2017.
1. Yes 2. No.............just like the rest of the Federal Government.
We should start a new thread on the "over-under" for the 2017 audit.The same law that requires the rest of the federal government to do so also applies to DoD.
DoD has been preparing for it for over a decade and looks to be ready by 2017.
http://comptroller.defense.gov/fiar/fiar_plan.aspx
Could be legit…if that figure is the "then year cost" adjusted to "now year dollars"…given the 220% inflation rate that's accrued in the past 30 years.http://us.cnn.com/2016/06/20/politics/military-aviation-crash/index.html
I can guarantee the FA-18A in Fallon wasn't worth $71 million.
Or if it landed on prehistoric and sacred First Peoples burial grounds or some such place that had to be completely decontaminated of POL, carbon composite fibers, other carcinogens, etc. I have no doubt that "bean counters" could conjure up a total "cost" of $71M without even trying.
Thus the phrase "Bought the Farm".Ah yes, the pesky "Other property damages" section of the SIR.
Because the Federal Government doesn't pay taxes nor is publicly traded the GAO to the best of my knowledge doesn't calculate depreciation for property. CNN can only use what the stuff cost new and calculate in today's dollars.............although I'm guessing they were to lazy to do even that and pulled the numbers out of their ass.