Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I honestly think the Harrier is probably cooler...more fun to fly...
Care to expand on this?
I should be selecting in a month or so. I was all about the hornet throughout training until going out to the weps det. Dropping blue death and onav-ing through the mtns. was a blast.
...the noise level is so high that during launch and recovery of a -35B, as of now, their recommendationt is that no one will be allowed to be topside. Of course, that's what they are saying now ... perhaps, instead, NAVAIR will start a project for new and improved hearing protection :icon_tong
I tend to disagree that a 2000 hour training command guy coming back to the Hornet after 3-4 years has nothing to offer (if he was able to get his quals during his first fleet tour) … sure, he’s not going to be the guy going to TG or WTI but he’s going to bring flight discipline and leadership. You won’t be teaching that guy how to be a wingman because he already knows how to fly and a CAT3 syllabus will get that guy back up to speed with tactics. Throw him in a 2 seat squadron and that can also mitigate any tactical deficiencies with running the radar or FLIR. That guy will be getting his section lead & div lead qual's back pretty quick. I think a squadron CO would rather have a guy like that than some second tour 500 hr guy who's coming back to the fleet with no quals/section lead only or some WSO retread O-4 (no hate there) that is truly a wingman.Being out of the Hornet for 3 years and then coming back and trying to become proficient again just doesn't happen...at least not really. You have nothing that anyone in the fleet wants.
I understand that dudes come to the VTs to get out, or not to deploy, but frankly some of them got sent here and are dying to get back. Are they only here because they aren't wanted in the fleet?