Okay one more post and I'll zip it for a while.
I know this is a ground related topic, but since all Marine officers are platoon leaders just as all enlisted Marines are riflemen, this question is still valid here.
I wondered after reading about Lt platoon leaders in the Korean war and Vietnam:
I know I am not in the position to question Corps procedures, but this is a nagging one that maybe others have as well.
Why does Lt platoon leaders have to stick out like a soar thumb (on humps)? If the Corps valued the Lts wouldn't it be reasonable to not announce to snipers who the Lt is...at least positionally in the two collumns. As long as the enlisted men know who the Lt is...aren't the Lts still perfectly able to lead the men?(speaking of humps out in the bush)
It just doesn't register to think that the likelyhood of Lts getting killed in combat as opposed to enlisted men is staggering because they're always convieniently found in the front of the line. Afterall, extra brownie points to those who pick off an officer in combat...that's the rule I think. This fact has been proven in combat. It almost comes to show that Lts are expendable...even disposable in a real combat situation, which I feel is not quite right. The men need leadership to survive...without it they'll be just a bunch of disoriented individuals, which will increase the likelyhood of casualties--a double negative.
I know very little about military procedures...but just questioning some things now while I'm still a civilian living in a democratic nation where we still have a right to disagree. I know once I'm in it'll be much harder to raise such questions. Afterall, the Corps isn't a democracy the way I see it.
Please...to put this to rest, I wish to hear the opinions of some officers.
Semper Fi
I know this is a ground related topic, but since all Marine officers are platoon leaders just as all enlisted Marines are riflemen, this question is still valid here.
I wondered after reading about Lt platoon leaders in the Korean war and Vietnam:
I know I am not in the position to question Corps procedures, but this is a nagging one that maybe others have as well.
Why does Lt platoon leaders have to stick out like a soar thumb (on humps)? If the Corps valued the Lts wouldn't it be reasonable to not announce to snipers who the Lt is...at least positionally in the two collumns. As long as the enlisted men know who the Lt is...aren't the Lts still perfectly able to lead the men?(speaking of humps out in the bush)
It just doesn't register to think that the likelyhood of Lts getting killed in combat as opposed to enlisted men is staggering because they're always convieniently found in the front of the line. Afterall, extra brownie points to those who pick off an officer in combat...that's the rule I think. This fact has been proven in combat. It almost comes to show that Lts are expendable...even disposable in a real combat situation, which I feel is not quite right. The men need leadership to survive...without it they'll be just a bunch of disoriented individuals, which will increase the likelyhood of casualties--a double negative.
I know very little about military procedures...but just questioning some things now while I'm still a civilian living in a democratic nation where we still have a right to disagree. I know once I'm in it'll be much harder to raise such questions. Afterall, the Corps isn't a democracy the way I see it.
Please...to put this to rest, I wish to hear the opinions of some officers.
Semper Fi