0621 Hertz
Well-Known Member
Lots of pros/cons for both.
MSFS one is great for starting the jet/working on ground ops flows, course rules and shooting instrument approaches, you just cant use TACAN approaches right now, so I use airports with VORTACs. Despite being garbage about FAM maneuvers (pattern work/aero and stalls are horrible), worth the money to me. Jet starts up reasonably realistically, its just missing the CAUG and RADALT bit test, but allows you to move the switches for "chairflying" it. Does not have high gain NWS, its on by default and you can't turn it off
The VNAO T45 for DCS for me was great for bouncing in the pattern, doing PAs, and some FAM maneuvers, handling was OK but much better than the MSFS one. However the systems are bad and it starts too fast.
MSFS one is great for starting the jet/working on ground ops flows, course rules and shooting instrument approaches, you just cant use TACAN approaches right now, so I use airports with VORTACs. Despite being garbage about FAM maneuvers (pattern work/aero and stalls are horrible), worth the money to me. Jet starts up reasonably realistically, its just missing the CAUG and RADALT bit test, but allows you to move the switches for "chairflying" it. Does not have high gain NWS, its on by default and you can't turn it off
The VNAO T45 for DCS for me was great for bouncing in the pattern, doing PAs, and some FAM maneuvers, handling was OK but much better than the MSFS one. However the systems are bad and it starts too fast.
Last edited: