• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Hot new helicopter/rotorcraft news

I think this is where a lot of people are getting confused. This is not designed to replace the HTs. The students doing COPT-R still do a full HT syllabus. They're just not going to Primary. I'm pretty sure the transition from a T-Cyclic is a lot less jarring than the transition from a T-6 and students seem to make that work.
This seems really important to reiterate. I'll admit to not grasping this key point early in the thread. I can truly say my 89 hours in the T-34C did nearly nothing for my helicopter stick and rudder ... er, cyclic and pedal skills.

Yes, I learned an ounce of officer ship, and a pound of EP memorization, flight planning, Air nav, etc. during Primary. But nothing about the T-34 prepared me for trying to hover inside that little concrete square during HT FAM 1.
 
As already discussed, this is possible in any underslung rotor system. The NYC 206 crash in April of this year was caused by Mast Bumping. You're right, the problem isn't alleviated - because physics is a harsh mistress - but it's also not unique to the R66.
Thanks for that info. From what I saw, it looked liked the A frame mounts had separated and the rotor system with the transmission had separated (corrosion or metal fatigue) - did not know that it was finally determined as mast bumping.
 
Thanks for that info. From what I saw, it looked liked the A frame mounts had separated and the rotor system with the transmission had separated (corrosion or metal fatigue) - did not know that it was finally determined as mast bumping.
They haven’t. I’ll wait for the final report, but my highly untrained eye sees structural failure, not mast bumping.
 
Back
Top