FormerRecruitingGuru
Making Recruiting Great Again
I can see it now...
![]()
I wouldn't mess with A4's...

He'll FIND you...
I can see it now...
![]()
I wouldn't mess with A4's...
![]()
He'll FIND you...
Is it possible that Idaho might soon be cooler than Washington?
Well, that little hurdle didn't prevent the Dems from passing the national assault weapons ban in the 90s. So, while SCOTUS does seem marginally more likely to overturn legislation which restricts gun ownership, don't think that just because certain verbiage appears in any State's constitution, that local legislators can't pass a bill which restricts gun owners.
At any rate, while it's good to be vigilant for "movements" such as these, considering the demogrqaphic make-up of WA (being largely rural and agricultural), I think our guns will likely be safe from the more urban-minded minority in Olympia.
Brett
. We have no right to bear arms listed in our state constitution.![]()
Not even liberal gun laws could make that a true statement
OR will always be the best though, athough I hope to make WA and the NUW my permanent address soon so I guess this applies to me
OR is by far the best of the three - especially when you factor in the awesomeness that is Ashland.
I am jealous to hear that you are heading up to Whidbey, I saw my snowboard on the wall of my garage the other day and got all choked up...
The cost of manufacturing ammo would increase, yes? Ammo prices are high as it is. I think that the basic premise of serialized ammo is not harmful, and would have the potential to aid law enforcement.Ashlander here, although it has changed a lot in the 20 years I've been away.
@ Pugs: I'm generally opposed to most of the restrictions on guns, but out of curiosity, what is the argument against serialized ammunition? Is it just so "The Man" can't keep tabs on you, or something more specific?
Brett
The cost of manufacturing ammo would increase, yes?
Ashlander here, although it has changed a lot in the 20 years I've been away.
@ Pugs: I'm generally opposed to most of the restrictions on guns, but out of curiosity, what is the argument against serialized ammunition? Is it just so "The Man" can't keep tabs on you, or something more specific?
Brett
Ashlander here, although it has changed a lot in the 20 years I've been away.
@ Pugs: I'm generally opposed to most of the restrictions on guns, but out of curiosity, what is the argument against serialized ammunition? Is it just so "The Man" can't keep tabs on you, or something more specific?
Brett
Well, I am "the man" so that's right outWhat they all said. Expensive and ineffective at doing anything to curb crime. It would simply be another tax and in this case would be found an onerous one to a person executing their rights. Maryland had a requirement that every handgun had to have a bullet fired through it and sent to the state forensics lab to do that wonderful bullet matching we see on TV so the criminals would be caught. They spent several million dollars on it over about six years and it contributed to solving one crime and that was only secondary evidence. They finally, in a rare bit of common sense, disbanded it.
Is "ballistics" (the common, "TV" understanding?) complete bullshit?