It’s an effort to repeal the 2002 AUMF (Iraq war), which isn’t relevant to this discussion.The most recent NDAA repeals the GWOT AUMF with strong bipartisan support.
We'll see if it has veto override power.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s an effort to repeal the 2002 AUMF (Iraq war), which isn’t relevant to this discussion.The most recent NDAA repeals the GWOT AUMF with strong bipartisan support.
We'll see if it has veto override power.
compared to a state versus non-state actor during... AUMF, I suppose?
and whether or not heading would have mattered depending on the ROE.
Well it is called WILDerness for a reason.I bet it gets wild out by you, as you get further and further into the woods/middle of nowhere (that term being a good thing)
That was step one.…and fire the JAGs.
Couple of good articles in the NYT and The Atlantic discussing this might be reasserting the Monroe Doctrine and also Secretary of State Rubio’s involvement.Bottom line, this should have been a F3EA thing, (find, fix, finish, exploit, analyze) thing. It’s what I did for three years of my life.
To the best of my knowledge, they just did F3. The only reason I can think of to not do the exploit/analyze is to get rid of the evidence.
Sink the evidence and fire the JAGs.