• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Downloading Music & SCI

Flying Low

Yea sure or Yes Sir?
pilot
Contributor
The point of it isn't to prosecute anyone. Regardless of their accuracy, the administering agencies place enough stock in them to use as a basis for hiring and firing.

Brett


I understand that. I guess I was combining the two. In other words how reliable can they be if they are not admissible in court. I know the purpose of the polygraphs. I'm just questioning as to how accurate are they really if courts won't even allow them.
 

Flash

SEVAL/ECMO
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
I understand that. I guess I was combining the two. In other words how reliable can they be if they are not admissible in court. I know the purpose of the polygraphs. I'm just questioning as to how accurate are they really if courts won't even allow them.

They have not always caught people that they should have, Ames is an excellent eample. However, I know for a fact that it has caught people that it should have.

It is just one tool of many that is used to try and weed out people who should not be working in certain jobs, whether for spying or for other reasons.
 

xmid

Registered User
pilot
Contributor
I think part of the reason they're not admissable in many courts is because of the implications that would have. Like if we think you are guilty of a crime we polygraph you and if you fail it you're guilty. Forget courts, if the system put enough stock in the polygraph you wouldn't even need them. Just polygraph someone and then sentence accordingly...
 

Flash

SEVAL/ECMO
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
I think part of the reason they're not admissable in many courts is because of the implications that would have. Like if we think you are guilty of a crime we polygraph you and if you fail it you're guilty. Forget courts, if the system put enough stock in the polygraph you wouldn't even need them. Just polygraph someone and then sentence accordingly...

They are not admissable because they are not completely reliable, and you can fool them if you are good. Ames did.
 

xmid

Registered User
pilot
Contributor
RetreadRand said:
.

I still can't believe that people would do that shit for a dollar.

I believe Hannsen had other motives (the thrill of it all?) because he told the soviets several times that he "didn't need as much money"...
 
Top