• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Dos Gringos

Regs

wink said:
Well stupid, redundant, juvenile, or needlessly costly regulations anyway. It isn't like NAVAIR doesn't have some idiotic regs, but we aren't proud of them, promote them to other services as enlightened, or accept them without our fair share of push back. THAT, I am proud of. You ought to try it some time.
Click to expand...

Then get them changed. Regs that are "stupid, redundant, juvenile, or needlessly costly" reduce safety, efficiency, and most importantly, combat effectiveness.
 
Kinner said:
Then get them changed. Regs that are "stupid, redundant, juvenile, or needlessly costly" reduce safety, efficiency, and most importantly, combat effectiveness.
Click to expand...

Please Sir,

losen this up a little bit.

il_430xN.25026656.jpg


This thread reminded me of a Youthley Puresome article.

http://www.tailhook.org/Fa02YTH.htm
 
All of a sudden, this thread feels like the Skipper just walked in on you doing something fun, yet stupid.
 
Kinner said:
What does anyone's understanding of the term JUDY have to do with "regulations?"

Perhaps because it's in the regs? Just a thought.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't call the ALSA manual "regs." More of a reference publication, really.

Brett
 
What is the problem?

My RIOs over the years in different aircraft used to call "Judy" routinely – nightly, on every training intercept with Ruthless Ruth in W-291 and also in the more hostile real world. I had the honor of flying with some of the very the best who knew what they were doing. Calling "Judy" was routine.

Have things so changed?
 
Kinner said:
Then get them changed. Regs that are "stupid, redundant, juvenile, or needlessly costly" reduce safety, efficiency, and most importantly, combat effectiveness.
Click to expand...
You missed the point of my post. My apologies. It meant to imply it was the AF that had the "stupid, redundant, juvenile, or needlessly costly" regs (apart from the Judy discussion here) and it was typical of many AF officers to promote them to other services as enlightened, or accept them without push back. It is the Navy that tends to push back against said idiotic regs. And by that I do mean, in part, getting things changed. Not that good ol bitching isn't helpful on several levels.;)
 
kinner said:
what does anyone's understanding of the term judy have to do with "regulations?"

perhaps because it's in the regs? Just a thought.
Click to expand...


judy.

anyone with the ability, we also send mickey's as a digital "bitchslap" to each other.
 
This thread is retarded. It was supposed to be about some goofy pilot band, not LULZ (H@IR FORCE SUXXXXORZ LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL....

Has anyone heard DG's second album? Is it as good as the first?
 
Nafod said:
This thread is retarded. It was supposed to be about some goofy pilot band, not LULZ (H@IR FORCE SUXXXXORZ LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL....

Has anyone heard DG's second album? Is it as good as the first?
Click to expand...

Basicly, bashing the AF is more fun then listening to Dos Gringos.
 
Nafod said:
This thread is retarded. It was supposed to be about some goofy pilot band, not LULZ (H@IR FORCE SUXXXXORZ LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL....

Has anyone heard DG's second album? Is it as good as the first?
Click to expand...
You seem to be lost. Are you trying to find this place? :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top