The PCR tests are literally not scientific, says the guy who invented the PCR test. Oh and he was a Nobel laureate in chemistry. Oh and he knew Fauci personally and called Fauci a liar and a fraud. Oh and he died in 2019 about four months before we know from email records that workers in a Wuhan virology biolab complained of health symptoms.
-
Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?
Go here:
Edit Account Details and Profile
COVID-19
- Thread starter Treetop Flyer
- Start date
Did he know the Clintons?
From last century, literally.
But so what, about the PCR tests. What's your point?
You got 3:34 out of me. He doesn’t say ‘they’re not scientific’. That was your claim. That’s not true.
I’ll break it down for you. He says if you have one molecule of something in your body, it can be magnified so much by the PCR that the results are mis-inferred. That is not scientific random sampling.
Scientific random sampling is saying we have 100 soccer players in a 2,000 student high school, so if we sample the student body in sample sizes of >30, we find we probably have enough students to produce a soccer team. By contrast, an overmagnified PCR sample would say we have 1 soccer player in a 2,000 student high school and this school has soccer in it!!! - people who infer the wrong results from the PCR would claim the school has enough students to produce a soccer team, when in fact the school doesn’t. Therefore, arriving at a wrong and unscientific answer.
All of the PCR tests being used today have magnification levels above what the Nobel prize winning dude would recommend.
Last edited:
Have you considered maybe you just aren’t picking up what he’s putting down?
I have not. You keep claiming an interpretation of his words in order to support things you claim he said but he did not. Do you have training as a chemist or is your experience limited to the comments section of a YouTube video?
Because it's not a vaccine . . . . .
He also claimed that HIV did not cause AIDS, soooo...he's got that going for him too.
He also has a Nobel prize. Do you have one of those?
Fauci espoused the idea that you could catch AIDS just by being around HIV+ people in the 80s and also inaccurately blamed the AIDS epidemic on Haitian immigrants, as long as we are using the benefit of hindsight to judge people's qualifications for our current situation.
Nope, but getting one does not make one infallible as several have proven.
Kary Mullis' denial that HIV causes AIDS wasn't a one-off claim and isn't something that was discovered to be wrong with the benefit of hindsight but a contrarian view that was known to be wrong for the entire time he made the claim, which from what I can find he never changed up until his death.