MasterBates
Well-Known Member
The only true safety or lack of one is between your ears, regardless of weapon.
+ Rep. I am leery in a theoretical sense of the Glock's so-called "safeties" in Condition I carry, but it's academic because I don't have a concealed carry permit. My main concern is the 5-pound trigger pull if you catch that trigger safety "just right."The only true safety or lack of one is between your ears, regardless of weapon.
You're just finishing HS and you are old school?
The only true safety or lack of one is between your ears, regardless of weapon.
Agree 100%. I got the glock because in reality, if someone breaks in my apt or I need to draw in an emergency situation, I don't want to spend that split second thinking about a safety or disengaging it. I want to send rounds downrange.
The Beretta is shit. Huge fat grip (on a 9mm, wtf), slide-mounted safety, and a slide design that gives it goofy recoil properties.
Sigs, 1911s, XDs, and Glocks are all pistols I would seriously consider over anything made by Beretta (not necessarily in that order).
The only problem I have with Sig's is their lack of a safety. The decocker is nice, but I also would like to have a mechanical safety. Maybe it's just because I'm old school, but that rules out Glocks and Sigs.
So, if I used 9mm Hollowpoints, vs. .40 S&W are the characteristics similar? Are both similarly accurate?