Pics, you have any pics of the beastie? I agree w/ FBW06, nice choice.
*EDIT* A pic with an AW zap on it would be nice
Ask and ye shall receive.
Pics, you have any pics of the beastie? I agree w/ FBW06, nice choice.
*EDIT* A pic with an AW zap on it would be nice
I own a 2000 Toyota Tacoma - 2.7L, 4 cyl, 4WD, SR5. Absolutely LOVE IT !!! You can't go wrong with a Tacoma (IMO).
Ask and ye shall receive.
Ok Ill bite
F Toyota, F them right in the Ass. I work as a Chrysler Jeep Dodge Salesmen. As for the "quality" or "ability" hey bring the most powerful truck Toyota has in its fleet of Pickups and Ill drag it across the lot wheels screaming in agony with my Cummins Diesel Duely we got in the back.
Yeah, but he has a point.
My F-250, my mom's Ram 3500, or my dad's Chevy 2500 will all wipe the floor with any Jap truck sold in the US.
Yeh, I didn't mean to start a pissing contest with this thread.
Before I finished reading you post I was going to say "thank you unions", but you already said it ... its worth saying it again ...The Japanese manufacturers really gave the American manufacturers a wake-up call to get their quality up. I think it was Ford, had two transmissions available for one of their trucks, one made in Japan and one made in the United States. Well the one made in Japan got overwhelming demand, with customers even saying they'd wait extra long to get a truck with the Japanese tranny, because the American-built one was such crap.
The great irony here is that the Japanese adapted American quality-control standards into their vehicles to up the quality so much, they had a legendary American quality-control expert (I forget his name). Originally, Japanese products were of horrid quality, so the Japanese fixed this really
fast.
American manufacturers had let the quality slide for a bit, basically not implementing their own standards, but then got the picture, unfortunately they have been hit with very high healthcare and high pension costs that they underestimated a great deal, plus unions, so implementing quality-control is tougher for them, but they are managing to do it from my understanding now.
Before I finished reading you post I was going to say "thank you unions", but you already said it ... its worth saying it again ...
THANK YOU UNIONS
I hope things are on the upswing for American made's - but I saw Chrysler had to cut some workers after a new union deal was struck ... and the employees were just 'blown away'. Guess what, someone has to pay for your pay increase/healthcare expenses etc etc etc... and it's not being paid in sales revenue. Can't cook the books anymore...
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071103/BUSINESS01/711030380/0/SPORTS07&theme=AUTOTALKS072007
Cerberus is the best thing that ever happened to Chrysler. Out of the big 3 we have the most cash to play with even though our sales arent the highest and thats because we dont have near the weight around our neck that Ford and GM does. I almost feel sorry for Ford, some of the stuff they were doing the last 10 years has really come back to haunt them. GM's biggest problem is just trying to make to many of the same car with no real advantage or disadvantage with going to one brand or another within them.
Since automotive assets are not exactly yielding top dollar these days, Cerberus' most likely strategy would seem to be to dress Chrysler up for a sale to another automaker - probably a foreign one. Scale still counts and there are numerous companies in Europe and Asia who would like to control Chrysler's market share and distribution network.