MasterBates
Well-Known Member
I forsee VP or HSL in the board-carryer's future.
If they don't go there, that was where they should have gone.
If they don't go there, that was where they should have gone.
Where is the option to beat the offending students senseless with the mini-board for being tools?
I have seen studs and have had onwings use them. I don't see what the BFD is, personally. I just think it is personal preference. I am not a huge systems nazi. My goal is to get the kid to pass his checkride and successfully solo...
That's my style as well. Am I asking the student to be able to draw a system to some engineer? No. I am asking that they understand the system and what happens when that particular system fails (meaning I'm more interested in the EPs). It's not like you'd be sitting in an aircraft and would draw out the system to figure out the solution to a particular emergency. Besides, if you can't affect it from the cockpit then it's probably not worth memorizing.
Tell that to the VP IPs. :icon_wink
All they wanted to do was bust my balls on useless widgets tucked away in some obscure part of the aircraft that is completely useless to me as a pilot and nothing you can do about in the cockpit.
I don't think that's what kmac meant. Knowing some useless widget tucked away that you can't affect, can lead you to determining exactly how far to stretch or tighten the definition of "Land as soon as possible."Tell that to the VP IPs. :icon_wink
All they wanted to do was bust my balls on useless widgets tucked away in some obscure part of the aircraft that is completely useless to me as a pilot and nothing you can do about in the cockpit.
I have seen studs and have had onwings use them. I don't see what the BFD is, personally. I just think it is personal preference. I am not a huge systems nazi. My goal is to get the kid to pass his checkride and successfully solo. I tell my onwings that by the 4390 they need to be able to draw the basic systems (fuel, prop, oil) from memory or they are in danger of not passing the checkride. I have them brief me the systems two times during contacts, but I don't sit there and watch them draw it. If they can't draw it, then they are only screwing themselves. Like I have said before, if they can talk me through a very basic block diagram and know the limits associated with it, then that is all the brain cells they need to waste on systems.
I don't think that's what kmac meant. Knowing some useless widget tucked away that you can't affect, can lead you to determining exactly how far to stretch or tighten the definition of "Land as soon as possible."
For example - knowing that a filter is bypassed may allow you to stretch to land at an airfield.
What kmac refers to is probably knowing how many microns it can filter.
Systems knowledge is important. But what I was getting at (perhaps I am no so good at da typing), was what you mentioned. That widget a is 57.54 Volts +- 0.37 or that the filter is 10 micron steel mesh, or that there are 7 static port holes, each 2 millimeters in diameter or whatever the hell.... basically crap that you'd have to ask a maintainer or look up in a maintenance manual.
I am seeing now in helos that systems knowledge is HUGE. That goes without saying. But knowing random, useless knowledge that doesn't help you as a pilot to troubleshoot or fix a problem is just a NATOPS dick contest.
Tell that to the VP IPs. :icon_wink
All they wanted to do was bust my balls on useless widgets tucked away in some obscure part of the aircraft that is completely useless to me as a pilot and nothing you can do about in the cockpit.
Just wait till you go HSL. Then you get to know all those fun little details. :icon_tong
In the fleet, absolutely. In HT's, I'd argue that it's about getting you in the proper mindset.I am seeing now in helos that systems knowledge is HUGE. That goes without saying. But knowing random, useless knowledge that doesn't help you as a pilot to troubleshoot or fix a problem is just a NATOPS dick contest.