• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

29JUNE2026 IWC Board

Crazy, because according to the publicly-listed FY27 Board Schedule, EOD was set to convene 2 weeks ago. Meanwhile, IWC was scheduled over two months ago. Obviously, the communities are very different sizes, but man what's going on with INTEL?? Is there any way for someone with Sharepoint access to see if the INTEL board even convened?
EOD is a different animal, by the time the board convenes they already have a good idea who will be picked due to the selection process prior to board.

It is also a very tight community so if a person is enlisted or if they are family of a person in EOD that can really help. I had an applicant who was the son of a SEAL who went EOD LDO, I received a few calls from MCPO's, and a few CDR's saying if anything was needed to let them know.
 
EOD is a different animal, by the time the board convenes they already have a good idea who will be picked due to the selection process prior to board.

It is also a very tight community so if a person is enlisted or if they are family of a person in EOD that can really help. I had an applicant who was the son of a SEAL who went EOD LDO, I received a few calls from MCPO's, and a few CDR's saying if anything was needed to let them know.
Out of curiosity, do officer candidates selected to earn a commission in the SpecWar communities go through in separate divisions from other designators? (similar to boot camp)
 
EOD is a different animal, by the time the board convenes they already have a good idea who will be picked due to the selection process prior to board.

It is also a very tight community so if a person is enlisted or if they are family of a person in EOD that can really help. I had an applicant who was the son of a SEAL who went EOD LDO, I received a few calls from MCPO's, and a few CDR's saying if anything was needed to let them know.
Makes complete sense, but has the INTEL board really been deliberating for this long? I was under the impression that the selection process isn't itself very long once the board convenes (and has likely already completed), so really we're just waiting for them to release results for some reason. I understand what you're saying, that the EOD board mostly knew its determinations before the convention, but how are communities like EOD able to release results so much faster once they've made their decisions?
 
Makes complete sense, but has the INTEL board really been deliberating for this long? I was under the impression that the selection process isn't itself very long once the board convenes (and has likely already completed), so really we're just waiting for them to release results for some reason. I understand what you're saying, that the EOD board mostly knew its determinations before the convention, but how are communities like EOD able to release results so much faster once they've made their decisions?
When boards release results do they release results + OCS date at the same time? If that's the case then it's probably taking forever to get results back because they are trying to figure out where to slot this batch of IWC designators. Same case happened for supply results took forever and there's no OCS dates until the next fiscal year for them.

^If that's not how they process things then I have no clue why theyre taking forever
 
When boards release results do they release results + OCS date at the same time? If that's the case then it's probably taking forever to get results back because they are trying to figure out where to slot this batch of IWC designators. Same case happened for supply results took forever and there's no OCS dates until the next fiscal year for them.

^If that's not how they process things then I have no clue why theyre taking forever
I thought Supply only took like a month to get results after their board. They got late OCS dates, but isn't that because of overcrowding at Supply School (which is a different issue)?
 
I thought Supply only took like a month to get results after their board. They got late OCS dates, but isn't that because of overcrowding at Supply School (which is a different issue)?
I can confirm there are some serious supply school backups. I graduated in Dec 25’ and I believe there are a people from my class who just started supply school. If not, have been there for a very short time. It would make sense for the delay/late OCS class dates.
 
I am applying as a civilian and am therefore an outsider. But I have been expanding my network and trying to use contacts on the inside whom I trust to piece together some semblance of reasoning in what's going on. So I'll dump some thoughts. Call it catharsis

I would guess that about the time when we heard that subsequent IWC boards were cancelled was when they made their decisions. That it was about then that they knew they met a quota and hence would not need the upcoming boards. @skibum mentioned how odd it seems that they frontload one huge board rather than spreading out their quota over four boards; and that they might be losing good recruits with this model. I asked about this puzzling trend and my recruiter said that there is a new admiral in charge of recruiting whose philosophy is to "fill the funnel", that they will take as many people who qualify for the program as possible then cancel unneeded boards. This seems to be them "filling the funnel". From at least one angle, this makes sense. Less boards clogging up the schedule of admirals I suppose. Perhaps they have data to suggest that spreading out boards really does not yield better recruits. Who knows, just spit balling here.

As for the delay, @Bluetango15 's suggestion makes a lot of good sense to my ear. If they notify everyone at the same time and the notification must come with an OCS date, scheduling a massive cohort would be a big job. And it would be a big job requiring other departments to cooperate, answer emails, do work, etc.

Personally, I look at the delay and speculate that it may be another quick round of security investigations. I know that we all had to have been approved at some level to even make it to board. But I strongly suspect that they take measures to avoid giving someone a PROREC-Y who would not pass the TS-SCI adjudication. In other words, maybe the bar to get to the board is a little lower than to get that PROREC-Y. And if that is the case, several weeks' delay would make sense. This theory would also explain why other designators already know. A smaller group means a statistically less likely chance that one or two cases "on the bubble" are holding up the whole group. Again, just stabbing in the dark right now.

Optimism: in a way, I am glad for the delay. Maybe I just tell myself this to make it through the day, but it appears that this will be a big board. A quick turnaround might have meant faster paperwork just due to a lower accession quota. I'm guessing that the cancelled boards and the long turnaround taken together presage a large class and a high selection rate which is what we all want.

If I had to put money on it, I'd guess it's more security clearance investigation. Giving a PROREC-Y to someone who might not get that level 5 clearance would be an ugly, ugly situation for that sailor not to mention coming up short of the accession quota.

One more disclaimer: I'm just an outsider and trying to piece things together. @exNavyOffRec would have the experience to tell you all where I'm full of shit and where I might be barking up the right tree.

Either way, I'll be a happier man when I know what I can or cannot look forward to.
 
Back
Top